Which has higher ground clearance, Vios or Yaris L?
2 Answers
The ground clearance of the Yaris L and Vios is almost the same. More relevant information is as follows: 1. The Vios uses the same engine and transmission as the Yaris L, and these two cars are built on the same platform. 2. The Yaris L and Vios are equipped with two engines, one is a 1.3-liter naturally aspirated engine, and the other is a 1.5-liter naturally aspirated engine. 3. The front suspension of the Yaris L and Vios uses a MacPherson independent suspension, and the rear suspension uses a torsion beam non-independent suspension. Below is some introduction about the two engines of the Yaris L and Vios: 1. The 1.3-liter naturally aspirated engine has the model code 6NR-FE. This engine has a maximum power of 73 kW, a maximum torque of 123 Nm, a maximum power speed of 6000 rpm, and a maximum torque speed of 4200 rpm. This engine is equipped with a dual variable valve timing system and uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block. It is paired with a 5-speed manual transmission or a CVT transmission. 2. The 1.5-liter naturally aspirated engine has the model code 7NR. This engine has a maximum power of 79 kW, a maximum torque of 140 Nm, a maximum power speed of 6000 rpm, and a maximum torque speed of 4200 rpm. This engine is equipped with variable valve timing technology and uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block. It is paired with a 5-speed manual transmission or a CVT transmission.
As a seasoned driver with over a decade of experience, I've test-driven the Vios and Yaris L multiple times. Both vehicles maintain a similar ground clearance of around 140mm, roughly the height of a small beverage bottle. This means they handle speed bumps and potholes comfortably in urban driving, offering stable and smooth rides. However, on rural dirt roads or high curbs, you'll need to slow down and exercise caution to avoid scraping the undercarriage. Compared to SUVs with 150mm+ clearance, their off-road capability is slightly weaker, making them better suited for paved roads. In terms of driving experience, both prioritize fuel efficiency and practicality, with low fuel consumption and nimble steering that's beginner-friendly. That said, prolonged use in rainy or muddy conditions increases the risk of mud accumulation due to the lower chassis – regular cleaning is advised. Ultimately, when choosing between them, I prioritize intended use: either works fine for daily commutes, but for off-roading, opt for higher-clearance models.
