Which has higher fuel consumption, the Changan CS75 or the Haval H6?
3 Answers
Haval H6 has higher fuel consumption. Additional information: 1. Fuel consumption of the new Changan CS75: Around 8 liters for manual transmission models, while automatic transmission models generally stabilize at around 9 liters. 2. Fuel consumption of the older Changan CS75: Generally about 1 liter higher than the new model, but still reasonable on average. The 1.5T manual transmission stabilizes at around 9 liters, while the 1.8T automatic transmission reaches about 11 liters. 3. Fuel consumption of the Haval H6: The Haval H6 comes in two models, 1.5T and 2.0T. The 1.5T model generally stabilizes at around 9.5 liters, while the 2.0T model reaches about 11 liters.
Let me share my perspective from a daily commuting standpoint. The Haval H6 tends to consume slightly more fuel on urban roads. Based on my experience driving a friend's older model, it averages around 9L/100km, while the Changan CS75 typically stays around 8L/100km. This might be because the H6's engine tuning prioritizes power delivery - it's more responsive but thirstier, especially during traffic jams where idle fuel consumption is higher. When driving the CS75, I noticed its lightweight design and better aerodynamic efficiency help save fuel. Driving habits also significantly impact consumption - aggressive acceleration can spike fuel usage by about 15%. On highways, the difference narrows, with the CS75 being slightly more economical at cruising speeds. For better fuel efficiency, I recommend regular maintenance including tire pressure checks (underinflated tires can increase consumption by 1-2%) and air filter replacements. For city commuting, the CS75 proves more economical overall.
As someone who frequently deals with vehicles, analyzing fuel consumption requires a technical perspective. The Haval H6's 1.5T engine delivers high power output, but its fuel system tuning is relatively aggressive, resulting in an average urban fuel consumption of 9-10 liters. In comparison, the Changan CS75 with the same displacement is more balanced, averaging around 8-9 liters. The reasons include the H6's slightly heavier weight and its transmission's slower response, which can lead to fuel wastage on short stretches. I've also observed that tire type has a significant impact—for instance, the H6 versions with wider tires experience greater rolling resistance. In daily driving, avoiding full loads and frequent stop-starts can reduce fuel consumption, and optimizing driving habits can save a liter or two. Considering maintenance costs, the CS75 is simpler to service and generally more fuel-efficient, making it particularly user-friendly for average families.
