Which has higher fuel consumption between JAC Refine 2.0 and 2.4?
4 Answers
The fuel consumption of Refine's 2.0 and 2.4 models is basically similar. In urban driving, the 2.4 model consumes about 1 liter more, but on highways, the 2.4 model is more fuel-efficient than the 2.0. Below is relevant information: 1. Fuel consumption: Fuel consumption generally refers to constant-speed fuel consumption. Constant-speed fuel consumption is the vehicle's fuel consumption per 100 kilometers obtained in constant-speed driving fuel consumption tests specified by national standards for certain types of vehicles. 2. JAC Group: JAC Group has a high-level R&D team of nearly 5,000 people, adhering to the key technology R&D route of "energy saving, environmental protection, safety, intelligence, connectivity, and comfort." It has formed a complete forward R&D system including the R&D of complete vehicles, core powertrains, automatic transmissions and software systems, as well as key components, test verification, and calibration development.
I've been driving a JAC Refine for over a decade, and as a 2.0L owner, the fuel consumption is indeed significantly lower than the 2.4L version. The 2.0L averages 10-12L/100km in city driving, dropping to 8-9L on highways. My colleague with a 2.4L often complains about faster fuel consumption, easily exceeding 13L in urban areas, especially during traffic jams. The reason? The larger 2.4L displacement means the engine consumes more fuel—while offering slightly better performance, the cost is substantial. Regular maintenance like frequent air filter changes and tire pressure checks can help save on fuel costs. On long trips with heavy loads, the 2.4L's fuel consumption accelerates noticeably. Overall, if saving fuel is a priority, the 2.0L is the clear choice—saving hundreds in fuel costs annually for 20,000km of driving, making it a very economical option.
When chatting with friends about cars and discussing the fuel consumption of the Ruifeng, I've tried both the 2.0 and 2.4 models. It's true that the 2.4 has higher displacement and stronger power but consumes more fuel. The 2.0 can manage under 12 liters in daily driving, while the 2.4 often exceeds 14 liters, especially with quick acceleration leading to higher consumption. The difference is smaller on highways, with the 2.4 averaging just 1-2 liters more. Driving style is crucial—aggressive overtaking can cause fuel consumption to spike, and using air conditioning in summer adds to the consumption. Using high-quality full synthetic oil during oil changes might slightly reduce fuel usage, but the difference is minimal. If you prioritize handling, go for the 2.4; if you want affordability, the 2.0 is better, with the monthly fuel savings enough for a nice meal. Regular maintenance of spark plugs and tires to keep them in optimal condition can help alleviate some of the high fuel consumption concerns.
Simply put, the Jianghuai Refine 2.4 has higher fuel consumption than the 2.0 because larger engine displacement requires more fuel. The 2.0 typically consumes 8-10 liters per 100 km, while the 2.4 consumes 10-12 liters or even more. Driving habits greatly influence this—rapid acceleration or frequent braking wastes fuel. The gap widens in congested city driving but narrows on highways. Fuel consumption also depends on the vehicle's condition, as older cars may consume more. Choosing the 2.0 is more economical and environmentally friendly, saving money on fuel in the long run and benefiting the environment.
