Which has better performance, 1.0t or 1.8l?

[PrestonLee]

In most cases, a 1.0t turbocharged engine delivers stronger performance than a 1.8l naturally aspirated engine, but the actual driving experience also depends on the vehicle these engines are installed in. Below is relevant information: Introduction to Turbocharging: Turbocharging is a technology used by many engines. It can increase the air intake of an engine without enlarging its displacement, thereby enhancing engine power. Turbocharged engines can achieve greater power with lower fuel consumption and smaller displacement. As global environmental pollution becomes increasingly severe, countries worldwide are implementing stricter emission standards. Principle of Turbocharging: The principle of turbocharging is quite simple. A turbocharged engine is equipped with a turbocharger, which consists of two main components: an intake turbine and an exhaust turbine. These turbines are connected by a common shaft, and the exhaust turbine is also linked to the exhaust manifold. When the engine reaches a certain speed, the exhaust gases have sufficient energy to spin the exhaust turbine. Once the exhaust turbine starts rotating, the intake turbine begins to rotate as well, compressing air and forcing it into the engine's cylinders. Increasing the air intake requires a corresponding increase in fuel injection, which enhances the engine's power output.

[VanIker]

I've driven taxis for over a decade and have experience with both 1.0T and 1.8L engines. The turbocharged engine feels like drinking Red Bull, especially when the turbo kicks in at low speeds—it's got a real punch, but the high-end acceleration feels like it's running out of breath. The 1.8L is more like a marathon runner, delivering smooth and consistent power on the highway, as seamless as silk. Last year, I took my friend's 1.0T for a mountain run—during climbs, the engine revved high with the turbo whistling, only to be overtaken by a cargo-laden Wuling 1.8L chugging along steadily. If you're looking for strong performance, it really depends on the roads you frequent. For city traffic with constant stop-and-go, a turbo is more responsive. But if you're always on long trips, a larger naturally aspirated engine is more reliable, giving you confidence no matter how deep you press the throttle.

[Judah]

It was quite noticeable during the last test drive. The 1.0T felt a bit sluggish at initial acceleration, but when making a turn and stepping on the gas, the turbo suddenly roared and surged forward, sending my mom's grocery basket flying off the back seat. My cousin's 1.8L Sylphy felt completely different—the engine sound was like the static of an old record player, and the acceleration steadily pressed you into the seat. The mechanic said turbocharged engines require frequent high-quality oil changes, while naturally aspirated engines can keep running strong even after a major overhaul, lasting another decade. If you want that kick-in-the-back feeling, a turbo is the way to go, but you should also consider whether the power might decline after three to five years.

[DeBrody]

Displacement is just the starting point. My 1.0T Civic is tuned aggressively, with the turbo kicking in at just 1200 rpm, allowing it to outpace a 1.8L old Corolla by half a car length from a green light. However, one time with five people and the AC on, climbing an overpass required flooring the pedal, while a 1.8L GL8 followed leisurely in the rearview mirror. The newer 1.0T models now come with small-inertia turbos, significantly reducing lag. But when buying used, pay attention to maintenance records—turbo repairs can cost half an engine replacement.