Which has a lower failure rate, Lavida or Corolla?
2 Answers
According to feedback from a large number of car owners, the Toyota Corolla has a relatively lower failure rate. Below are the introductions of the Corolla and Lavida: 1. Corolla: The Corolla has a length, width, and height of 4635mm, 1780mm, and 1455mm respectively, with a wheelbase of 2700mm. The Corolla is equipped with two types of engines: one is a 1.8-liter naturally aspirated engine, and the other is a 1.2-liter turbocharged engine. 2. Lavida: The Lavida is a compact car. Its body dimensions are 4613mm in length, 1765mm in width, and 1460mm in height, with a wheelbase of 2610mm and a curb weight of 1210kg. It is powered by a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine, delivering a maximum horsepower of 112ps, a maximum power of 82kw, and a maximum torque of 145nm, paired with a 5-speed manual transmission.
As an ordinary car owner who has driven for many years, I previously owned a Volkswagen Lavida and now drive a Toyota Corolla. After using the Lavida for three or four years, some minor issues started to appear, such as slow power window operation, occasional dashboard error messages, and faulty turn signal contacts, leading to more frequent repairs. The Corolla, now two years in use, has hardly needed any visits to the repair shop. The engine runs smoothly, and the gearbox shifts seamlessly. Based on my experience, the Corolla indeed has a lower failure rate. Volkswagen cars come with more electronic systems, which are prone to issues, while Toyota's design emphasizes reliability more. Daily maintenance is also hassle-free, with Corolla parts being common and easy to replace. For long-term car use, choosing a Corolla can reduce trouble and extra expenses, saving time and effort. My personal suggestion is, if you care about fewer car troubles, the Corolla is a more reliable choice.
