What type of suspension does the Vision use?
3 Answers
The Vision uses a MacPherson independent suspension for the front and a torsion beam non-independent suspension for the rear. There are two common types of suspensions in vehicles: independent suspension and non-independent suspension. Common independent suspensions include MacPherson suspension, multi-link suspension, double-wishbone suspension, and double A-arm suspension. Non-independent suspensions include torsion beam suspension and solid axle suspension. In an independent suspension, there is no connection between the two wheels on the same axle, so the movement of the two wheels on the same axle does not interfere with each other. This type of suspension improves wheel contact with the ground, enhancing handling and comfort. In contrast, a non-independent suspension has a connection between the two wheels on the same axle, resulting in mutual interference in their movement. The comfort and handling of non-independent suspensions are inferior to those of independent suspensions.
I've studied the structures of many domestic brand cars. Take the Geely Vision as an example—it uses a MacPherson strut front suspension and a torsion beam non-independent rear suspension. This setup is pretty standard for economy models. The MacPherson design is simple and space-saving, making it ideal for compact bodies while providing decent support during turns. As for the rear torsion beam, it's affordable and durable but handles bumps and vibrations on rough roads less effectively. If you drive this car daily, you'll find it stable for commutes, though it might feel a bit stiff over potholes. I'd recommend regular checks on the shock absorbers and rubber bushings to prevent aging from affecting ride comfort. It holds up fine when new, but as mileage adds up, maintenance becomes crucial—otherwise, suspension issues could lead to uneven tire wear. The Vision is positioned as an entry-level model, with its suspension prioritizing practicality and cost-efficiency.
As someone who has driven the Vision for several years, I can personally attest that its suspension setup—MacPherson struts in the front and a torsion beam at the rear—performs decently for daily commutes. It feels comfortable on city roads with smooth, damped rides that aren’t too bumpy. However, on rural dirt roads, the non-independent rear suspension shows its limitations, producing noticeable thuds. Suspension plays a critical role in handling, especially during cornering acceleration: the front MacPherson struts offer solid grip, while the cost-saving torsion beam rear slightly holds it back. Regular maintenance is key—I visit the workshop every 20,000 km to inspect components like links and bushings, spending a little to avoid major repairs. For budget-conscious buyers, the Vision’s suspension strikes a balanced choice, though it can’t match the comfort of independent setups. If value for money is your priority, it’s worth considering.
