What's the difference between 1.3 and 1.5 displacement?
3 Answers
The differences between 1.3 and 1.5 displacement are as follows: 1. The power of a 1.3-liter engine is not as strong as that of a 1.5-liter engine, but the fuel consumption of the 1.3-liter engine is lower than that of the 1.5-liter engine. 2. Comparing a 1.3-liter turbocharged engine with a 1.5-liter naturally aspirated engine, the 1.3-liter turbocharged engine has stronger power. 3. Comparing a 1.3-liter turbocharged engine with a 1.5-liter turbocharged engine, the 1.5-liter turbocharged engine has stronger power, but its fuel consumption is also higher. 4. If comparing a 1.3-liter naturally aspirated engine with a 1.5-liter turbocharged engine, the 1.5-liter turbocharged engine has higher fuel consumption and stronger power.
As an ordinary driver, I feel the difference between 1.3L and 1.5L engines in terms of driving experience. Engine displacement simply refers to the size of the engine. A 1.5L engine has slightly larger cylinder volume than a 1.3L, so it provides stronger acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways or climbing hills. However, the downside is higher fuel consumption, particularly when using air conditioning or carrying more passengers. The 1.3L engine is more agile and fuel-efficient in city driving, consuming less fuel in traffic jams compared to the 1.5L. But its power output feels weaker, with slower throttle response and sluggish starts at traffic lights. Many new cars now come with turbochargers, allowing smaller engines to deliver similar power, but it's still recommended to test drive the actual vehicle. If you frequently drive on highways, a larger displacement engine offers more comfort; for urban commuting, a smaller displacement engine saves money and is sufficient.
From a car enthusiast's perspective, engine displacement refers to the volume difference of the combustion chambers. A 1.5L engine has about 0.2L more capacity than a 1.3L, meaning each cylinder can accommodate more air-fuel mixture, naturally resulting in higher power and torque output. This translates to more robust driving performance, especially when fully loaded or climbing hills without strain. The downside is higher fuel consumption and slightly increased maintenance costs. The smaller 1.3L displacement offers better fuel efficiency and potentially less daily wear, but may struggle with long-term high-load conditions. Technological advancements have narrowed the gap – for instance, small-displacement engines with turbocharging can achieve performance comparable to larger displacements. The key is to choose based on driving habits: opt for smaller engines for gentle driving, and larger ones for those who love spirited driving.
