What kind of body design do off-road vehicles generally adopt?

[MatteoAnn]

Off-road vehicles generally adopt a body-on-frame design, the most notable feature of which is its high longitudinal rigidity. Advantages of body-on-frame design: In the event of a collision, the frame's strong rigidity absorbs most of the impact energy, effectively protecting the body from damage, thus offering better safety. The chassis and body can be assembled separately and then joined together, simplifying the assembly process and making it easier to modify the vehicle model or adapt it for other purposes. Disadvantages of body-on-frame design: The main drawbacks include a relatively heavy body, a tendency to roll over when turning at high speeds, and less comfortable ride quality compared to unibody designs. Additionally, since a separate frame needs to be manufactured, the overall vehicle cost increases. Vehicles using body-on-frame design: Typically, trucks, large buses, and most hardcore off-road vehicles use this design, such as the Toyota Prado, Land Cruiser, Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, Jeep Wrangler, Commander, Hummer, Ford Everest, Mercedes-Benz G-Class, Suzuki Grand Vitara, Isuzu mu-X, Land Rover Defender, and domestic models like the BAW B series, BAW Warrior, BJ212, Dongfeng Mengshi, Haval H9/H5, Roewe W5, RX8, etc. Some high-end sedans also use body-on-frame design, such as the Mercedes-Benz S600.

[FelixLee]

As an enthusiast who frequently deals with off-road vehicles, I've noticed that these vehicles typically feature a body-on-frame design, also known as a non-unibody structure. The advantage of this design is that the frame acts like a sturdy skeleton, absorbing shocks from rough terrain, preventing excessive body sway, and ensuring passengers experience less discomfort. Imagine traversing rugged mountain trails or deserts—the frame can withstand significant impacts, reducing the risk of body distortion, unlike unibody vehicles, which are more prone to deformation or damage. The downside? It's heavier and consumes more fuel, but for off-roading, the trade-off is worth it. Modern vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler still use this traditional design because of its durability and reliability, plus the frame makes modifications easier. I often see enthusiasts adding underbody protection or upgraded suspension to enhance performance. In short, it's built for extreme terrain, sacrificing some comfort for safety and longevity—perfect for adventure-loving folks.

[DelAlina]

I've been driving off-road vehicles in the wild for ten years, and that sturdy separate chassis design is truly thoughtful. Every time I go through mud or steep slopes, the body doesn't shake like a regular car, as the chassis disperses vibrations, making the ride more stable inside. For example, last time I went into the mountains, the body didn't make strange noises or deform, and most importantly, it protected the occupants. This frame structure is standard for off-road vehicles—the chassis is independent, and the body doesn't bear the full weight, resulting in fewer breakdowns over long-term use. Although it consumes more fuel in the city, for true off-road enthusiasts, it's durable and easy to maintain. I often clean the chassis to prevent rust. It can also handle daily use, and with ample room for modifications, adding a bumper makes it much safer.

[OPaislee]

Looking at the history of off-road vehicles, I noticed that the body design has always adhered to a non-load-bearing frame, originating from military traditions with a structure that separates the chassis from the body. From old Jeeps to new models, this design ensures the chassis has strong impact resistance, the body remains stable with minimal deformation, and the vehicle is reliable for off-roading. Why not switch to a unibody design? Because the harsh terrain in the wild requires the frame to absorb shocks and protect both the occupants and the vehicle. Reflecting on classic models like the Land Rover, the structure has largely remained unchanged, perfectly suited for expedition needs.