
During the Subject 3 driving test, in addition to the computer evaluating whether the examinee's operations are correct, the invigilator sitting beside the examinee will also observe if there are any improper operations during the test. This is called manual evaluation. Therefore, even if the computer does not deduct points, failing due to the invigilator's deduction still results in disqualification. Below are the evaluation criteria for Subject 3: 1. Vehicle preparation: Failing to walk around the vehicle counterclockwise to inspect the vehicle's appearance and surrounding environment results in disqualification. 2. Disqualification scenarios: Starting the vehicle with insufficient brake air pressure; starting with doors not fully closed; starting the engine with the gearshift not in neutral; starting without releasing the parking brake and failing to correct it promptly.

The manual evaluation in Subject 3 essentially means the examiner watches your entire driving test and scores whether you pass or fail. During my own test, the pressure was immense—the examiner sat in the passenger seat, scrutinizing every move without blinking. Why insist on manual evaluation? Because real-road conditions are unpredictable; machines can't accurately assess your reaction to sudden hazards like pedestrians jaywalking or your split-second decisions to avoid emergencies. The evaluation focuses on whether operations like starting, lane-changing, and parking meet safety standards. For example, if you change lanes without signaling, the examiner will deduct points or even fail you on the spot. Common mistakes include slamming the accelerator due to nerves or forgetting to buckle up—details only a human examiner can catch. During practice, instructors always emphasize simulating real-road scenarios and internalizing basic rules. Though manual evaluation may carry some subjectivity, it genuinely tests your safe-driving competence, ensuring you won’t endanger yourself or others after getting licensed.

During the Category 3 driving test evaluation, I primarily observe how candidates handle various situations on real roads. Manual assessment is indispensable as it captures crucial details like scanning traffic conditions, checking blind spots, or making timely yielding decisions for safety. Examiners follow a detailed scoring rubric where each operation is checked against deduction criteria - for instance, crossing lane lines or running red lights results in immediate disqualification. The evaluation process involves human supervision throughout, from pre-driving checks and smooth starts to navigating complex road sections. The core objective is to certify competent drivers and reduce traffic risks. Candidates often fail due to nervous, rigid operations or neglecting light usage. Overall, manual intervention ensures realistic assessments that foster responsible habits, while our regular examiner training maintains fairness and consistency.

Before the driving test (Subject 3), my instructor reminded me that the manual evaluation means the examiner watches your every move throughout the test, with a focus on assessing safety awareness. The evaluation criteria include small details like smooth starting, checking mirrors when changing lanes, and controlling parking distance. The examiner deducts points based on experience, such as forgetting to signal or making incorrect gear shifts. Paying more attention to common mistakes during practice can significantly improve the pass rate. The manual method allows flexible handling of changing road conditions, making it highly practical.


