What is the fuel tank capacity of the 2016 Passat in liters?
2 Answers
The 2016 Passat has a fuel tank capacity of 69 liters. In terms of powertrain, it offers three configurations: the 280 badge represents the 1.4T EA211 engine paired with a DQ200 seven-speed dry dual-clutch transmission, while the 330 and 380 badges denote the high and low power versions of the 2.0T third-generation EA888 engine, respectively, both paired with a DQ381 seven-speed wet dual-clutch transmission. The 2017 Passat 280TSI DSG Elegance Edition has a fuel tank capacity of 69 liters. The 2019 Passat 280TSI Business Edition (China VI) has a fuel tank capacity of 66 liters. During actual refueling, the amount of fuel may exceed the nominal capacity. This is because the fuel tank capacity specified by the manufacturer is measured from the bottom of the tank to the safe fill level, with additional space left between the safe fill level and the tank opening. This space ensures that the fuel can expand when temperatures rise without overflowing. If fuel is filled up to the tank opening during refueling, the actual amount of fuel added may exceed the nominal tank capacity. To check the remaining fuel level, drivers can observe the fuel gauge on the right side of the instrument panel, marked with E (Empty) and F (Full). When the needle is close to E, it indicates low fuel, while nearing F means the tank is sufficiently full.
To be honest, I've been driving a 2016 Passat for several years, and its 66-liter fuel tank is thoughtfully designed, especially considering family travel needs. On a full tank, it can cover about 600 to 700 kilometers on long trips, depending on road conditions and driving habits; in city traffic with fuel consumption rising to around 10 liters per 100 km, it still manages over 500 kilometers. What stands out in my memory is that one trip where a single tank covered most of the journey without frequent refueling stops, saving both time and energy. As Volkswagen's standard mid-size sedan, the Passat's fuel tank capacity is similar to competitors like the Magotan, but I find 66 liters strikes the right balance between weight and practicality—too large a tank adds weight and may affect fuel efficiency, while too small is inconvenient. For daily use, I only need to refuel once a week for my commute, and I can wait for cheaper gas prices to top up when fuel costs fluctuate. Overall, this design makes driving life easier, with occasional attention to fuel system maintenance—like checking the fuel cap's seal—to avoid issues.
