What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda3 2.0?
3 Answers
The Mazda3 2.0 has 7 models currently on sale. Among them, the 2021 models—2.0L Automatic Base Edition, Automatic Core Edition, Automatic Premium Edition, Automatic Smart Edition, Automatic Elegance Edition, and Automatic Sport Edition—all equipped with a 158-horsepower engine, have an NEDC fuel consumption of 5.8L per 100km. The Mazda3 2020 model—2.0L X Spark Ignition Premium Edition, equipped with a 180-horsepower engine, has an NEDC fuel consumption of 5.2L per 100km. The fuel tank capacity is the same across different Mazda3 2.0 models. The distance that can be covered on a full tank of fuel is as follows: For models equipped with a 158-horsepower engine and an NEDC fuel consumption of 5.8L per 100km, the fuel tank capacity is 50L, allowing a distance of 50/5.8*100=862km on a full tank. For models equipped with a 180-horsepower engine and an NEDC fuel consumption of 5.2L per 100km, the fuel tank capacity is 50L, allowing a distance of 50/5.2*100=962km on a full tank. Vehicle fuel consumption is directly influenced by five major factors: driving habits, the vehicle itself, road conditions, natural wind, and environmental temperature. Specific factors that increase fuel consumption include: Driving Habits: Aggressive driving behaviors such as rapid acceleration, frequent overtaking, and not easing off the throttle before stopping at a red light can increase fuel consumption. The Vehicle Itself: Vehicles with larger engine displacements generally consume more fuel than those with smaller displacements because larger displacements typically produce more power, requiring more gasoline to burn and perform work. Heavier vehicles also have higher fuel consumption due to the greater driving torque needed. Road Conditions: Driving on dirt roads, muddy roads, soft surfaces, or mountainous terrain increases resistance and fuel consumption. Natural Wind: Driving against the wind or on windy days increases vehicle resistance and fuel consumption. Low Environmental Temperature: When the engine block temperature is low, the gasoline injected during a cold start does not atomize easily, requiring more gasoline to be injected for combustion, thus increasing fuel consumption. Additionally, lower temperatures prompt the engine control unit to use higher RPMs to warm up the engine, further increasing fuel consumption.
My Mazda Axela 2.0 has been running for three years, with an average fuel consumption of around 8L/100km in the city. During peak traffic jams, it can rise to 9L or even higher, but it's very fuel-efficient on highways, consuming just over 6L when cruising steadily at 100km/h. The car's engine design is quite efficient, especially with Mazda's fuel-saving technology, but personal driving habits have a significant impact. I've tried aggressive acceleration and sudden braking, and the fuel consumption shot up. Now, I've learned to accelerate smoothly and brake in advance, which has reduced my fuel consumption to just over 7L, and the car runs even smoother. Regular checks on tire pressure and changing the engine oil also help save fuel. Don't underestimate these small details—they make long-term car usage more economical. I feel like I've found a good balance between power and fuel efficiency with this car.
I'm quite environmentally conscious when driving, and keeping the fuel consumption of my Mazda3 2.0 below 7L/100km is achievable. In urban areas, the combined fuel consumption is around 7-8L, dropping to just over 6L on highways, but road conditions determine everything. During heavy traffic, fuel consumption spikes, so I recommend avoiding peak hours or choosing more efficient routes. Mazda's engine optimization ensures more complete combustion, making driving more efficient, but it's still important to avoid prolonged idling and overloading. Simple techniques like maintaining a steady speed and using the air conditioning less not only save fuel but also reduce carbon emissions. After two years of ownership, these small adjustments have helped me save hundreds in fuel costs annually while minimizing environmental impact.
