
The Lynk & Co 02's fuel consumption per 100 kilometers varies by powertrain. The 1.5T model has a fuel consumption of 5.8-6.4L per 100km, while the 2.0T model consumes 6.7-6.8L per 100km. Larger displacement engines generally have higher fuel consumption. The powertrain options include a 1.5T engine paired with either a 6-speed manual or 7-speed dual-clutch transmission, and a 2.0T engine matched with a 6-speed automatic transmission. Here is more information about this car: 1. The Lynk & Co 02 measures 4448/1890/1528mm in length, width, and height, with a wheelbase of 2702mm. 2. The Lynk & Co 02 is equipped with 215/60R17 tires and has a ground clearance of 201mm, ensuring SUV-level passability.

Speaking of the fuel consumption of the Lynk & Co 02, as someone who frequently analyzes automotive data, I can tell you that it typically fluctuates between 6 to 7.5 liters per 100 kilometers. The officially announced combined fuel consumption is 6.5 liters per 100 kilometers, but the actual figure depends on driving conditions—for example, if you use the 1.5T turbocharged engine, it might rise above 7.5 liters in city traffic congestion, while smooth highway driving can bring it down below 6 liters. Many factors affect fuel consumption, such as engine design, vehicle weight, aerodynamic drag, and driving habits: aggressive acceleration and sudden braking will definitely increase fuel usage. Additionally, environmental conditions matter—cold starts in winter tend to raise fuel consumption. Regular maintenance, like oil changes and tire pressure checks, can help maintain lower fuel consumption levels. Overall, for a compact SUV, this fuel efficiency is quite economical, saving significantly more on fuel costs compared to older models, making it ideal for daily commuting.

As a Lynk & Co 02 owner with half a year of driving experience, I'd like to share some personal observations. For daily city commuting, fuel consumption averages around 7.5 liters per 100 km, but can spike to 9 liters during heavy traffic jams, which hurts a bit. Highway driving is much more fuel-efficient, maintaining a steady speed can bring it down to 5.8 liters, making long trips less demanding for frequent refueling. Driving style makes a significant difference - my habit of smooth acceleration and minimal hard braking keeps consumption nearly 1 liter lower than my neighbor's aggressive driving. Proper tire pressure and regular engine maintenance are crucial too; getting serviced every 5,000 kilometers helps maintain stable fuel gauge readings. Running the AC frequently or carrying full loads noticeably increases consumption, but overall it's quite economical, saving me 100-200 yuan monthly compared to my previous car.

Discussing the fuel consumption of the Lynk & Co 02, I think the key lies in the influencing factors. Official data shows a combined fuel consumption of 6.5 liters per 100 kilometers, but in actual driving, urban roads can reach over 7 liters, while highways can be below 6 liters. Road conditions greatly affect fuel consumption—congested roads with many traffic lights consume more fuel, while smooth roads save some. Driving habits also play a significant role; gentle starts and steady driving waste less fuel compared to sudden acceleration. Seasonal changes matter too—for example, cold starts in winter burn more fuel, and using air conditioning in summer consumes more. It's recommended to drive in eco mode daily, regularly check tire pressure and air filter conditions. These small adjustments can keep fuel consumption stable within a reasonable range, reducing unnecessary fuel expenses.

From a comparative perspective, the Lynk & Co 02 delivers decent fuel consumption among compact SUVs, averaging around 6-7 liters per 100 km. In real-world driving, it's slightly more fuel-efficient than the Toyota RAV4 I tested (approximately 7 liters), though not as economical as the Honda CR-V Hybrid (4.9 liters). With its robust power output and well-controlled engine efficiency, urban driving typically consumes about 7 liters—significantly more economical than larger SUVs like the Ford Edge. Offering great value for money, its highway fuel efficiency can drop to 5.8 liters, demonstrating strong cost-effectiveness. If you prioritize overall balance, it’s a smart choice—its fuel consumption won’t disappoint, keeping monthly fuel expenses within a reasonable budget.