What is the fuel consumption of the Leiling 1.6?

[LeAnna]

Leiling 1.6 has a fuel consumption of 7.50L. Below are the relevant details: Exterior: The new Leiling has added a sports kit for the sports version, including front and rear aerodynamic bumpers, a sports mesh piano black front grille, and sport-style exclusive seats, among others. The gasoline sports version also adopts a low-profile body stance. The exterior of the new Leiling sports version is more distinctive and aggressive. Interior: For the interior, the sports version adds red trim elements distributed on the door panels and center console, with the red and black color scheme enhancing the sporty feel. The overall design style continues that of the previous Leiling model, with no significant changes. In terms of details, the front armrest has been upgraded with a front and rear sliding function, improving practicality.

[DiIsabelle]

Speaking of the fuel consumption of the older Levin 1.6, I've driven it for almost five years and feel it's quite reasonable. During daily commutes in the city with heavy traffic and frequent traffic lights, the fuel gauge shows around 7.8 to 8.5 liters per 100 km; it's much more comfortable on the highway, where it can drop to about 6.5 liters. I drive gently, rarely stomping on the accelerator or brakes, and 92-octane gasoline is sufficient. The fuel consumption noticeably increases a bit when using the air conditioning in summer, especially for short city trips, where it can exceed 9 liters. A fully loaded trunk or carrying more passengers will definitely raise the fuel consumption. Overall, for a 1.6L engine, the Levin is relatively fuel-efficient, comparable to the Sylphy and Corolla from the same period.

[SamuelMarie]

My relative owns a 1.6L manual transmission Levin, which I occasionally drive. The manual version is indeed more fuel-efficient, with his daily commute averaging around 7L/100km. It's particularly economical on national highways, achieving as low as 5.9L when maintaining speeds between 60-80km/h. However, the engine is quite dated - power feels slightly weak when using air conditioning or climbing slopes, requiring deeper throttle input which increases fuel consumption. After years of use, fuel efficiency has slightly declined; his 8-year-old car now burns 0.5L more than when new. Replacing spark plugs and cleaning the throttle body showed some improvement. The 1.6L engine feels mature but outdated in technology, delivering average fuel economy performance.

[VanAbigail]

My 2011 Levin 1.6 automatic has been running for twelve years, averaging around 8.3L/100km for urban commuting. The 4AT transmission is smooth but has wide gear ratios, resulting in higher RPM. Maintaining constant speed is crucial - aggressive acceleration can spike instant fuel consumption to 14-15L. Regular maintenance makes a noticeable difference; after last air filter and oil change, the display showed a 0.4L drop. Tire pressure matters too - underinflation previously cost an extra 0.7L. Fuel grade makes little difference; 92 and 95 octane show no significant mileage variation. Modern hybrids are far more efficient - this old 1.6's fuel economy isn't impressive, just adequate for daily use.