What is the fuel consumption of the Changan CS75?

[ColeDella]

The MIIT comprehensive fuel consumption of the Changan CS75 is 6.5L/100km, while the actual fuel consumption is around 9L/100km. The MIIT comprehensive fuel consumption is data collected under ideal conditions, and due to various factors such as environment and driving habits, the actual fuel consumption tends to be higher than the MIIT figure. Additional information: 1. Definition of fuel consumption: Fuel consumption generally refers to constant-speed fuel consumption, which is the vehicle's fuel consumption per 100 kilometers obtained in constant-speed fuel consumption tests specified by national standards for certain types of vehicles. 2. Types of vehicles include: (1) M1 category, M2 category with a maximum design total mass not exceeding 3.5 tons, and N1 category compressed natural gas vehicles; M1 category and N1 category vehicles with a maximum design total mass not exceeding 3.5 tons, tested according to the method specified in GB/T-12545.1-2008 "Test methods for fuel consumption of passenger cars." (2) M2 category, M3 category, N2 category, and N3 category compressed natural gas vehicles with a maximum design total mass exceeding 3.5 tons; M2 category, M3 category, and N category vehicles with a maximum total mass greater than or equal to 2 tons, tested according to the method specified in GB/T-12545.2-2001 "Test methods for fuel consumption of commercial vehicles."

[Rowan]

I've been driving the Changan CS75 for almost two years now, and the daily fuel consumption is indeed heavily influenced by road conditions. During rush hour traffic in the city with constant stop-and-go driving, the displayed fuel consumption usually stays around 10 to 11 liters. On weekends when I take the highway back to my hometown using cruise control at 120 km/h, the consumption drops to just over 7 liters. With the recent sharp rise in fuel prices, I've done some calculations: urban commuting costs about 800 yuan per month in fuel, while highway driving can save 100-200 yuan. Compared to my friend's Haval H6, the CS75 saves about 0.5 liters per 100 km, but burns over 1 liter more than a Japanese CR-V. If you frequently encounter traffic jams, I'd recommend considering hybrid models. However, given the CS75's spacious interior, features, and this level of fuel consumption, I find it quite reasonable.

[OColin]

From a technical perspective, the CS75's fuel consumption performance is considered average among its peers in the domestic brand segment. Its 1.5T Blue Whale engine boasts decent thermal efficiency, but the 1.6-ton curb weight combined with the SUV's aerodynamic drag means it's not particularly fuel-efficient. For daily driving to save fuel, I've gathered some tips: maintaining a steady speed of 60-80 km/h is most economical; don't crank the AC too high—lowering it by two degrees can save nearly 1 liter of fuel; regular maintenance and air filter replacements also help. Post-break-in period, fuel consumption drops slightly—my car now at 20,000 km has a combined fuel consumption of 9.3 liters. Recently, I test-drove the second-generation 75 PLUS, and the newly calibrated 8AT transmission is indeed smoother, saving about 0.8 liters more than my older model on the same route.

[Nicole]

The main reasons for choosing the CS75 for our family were its practicality and cost-effectiveness. After driving it for half a year, the fuel consumption is slightly higher than expected, averaging just over 10 liters per 100 km for city commuting. It consumes the most fuel when stuck in traffic while picking up and dropping off kids for school—once the dashboard showed a spike to 13 liters. However, highway trips are much more pleasant, with fuel consumption dropping to just 7.6 liters for a family of five plus luggage. Compared to the Song Pro DM-i plug-in hybrid, which has a fuel consumption of just over 5 liters even when running on gasoline alone, the CS75 is several ten thousand yuan cheaper at purchase. Based on current 92-octane gasoline prices, the CS75 costs an extra 200-300 yuan per month in fuel compared to a sedan. My advice before buying: if you prioritize spaciousness and off-road capability, you’ll have to accept this fuel consumption; if fuel costs are a bigger concern, opt for a compact sedan.

[JasperLee]

Tested the fuel consumption performance of the third-generation CS75. During early rush hour traffic with AC on, driving 35 km in two hours showed 12.1 L/100km on the display; on smooth national highways at 80 mph, it dropped to 6.8 L/100km. The car's most economical speed range is between 70-90 km/h, with wind resistance significantly increasing beyond 110 km/h. After modifying my driving habits—such as anticipating traffic lights to ease off the throttle early and reducing sudden acceleration—my monthly average fuel consumption decreased by 0.7 L/100km. Maintaining tire pressure at 2.5 bar instead of 2.3 bar saves 0.3 L/100km. Fuel consumption spikes during cold winter starts, especially on short commutes in sub-zero temperatures, reaching up to 14 L/100km—northern owners are advised to switch to low-viscosity oil. Overall, the fuel consumption isn't particularly low, but it's acceptable considering the power and features.

[Reginald]

As an owner who has driven three generations of the CS75, fuel consumption needs to be discussed case by case. Short-distance urban commuting is indeed fuel-intensive, especially in winter with engine warm-up and traffic congestion, easily reaching 12L/100km. However, its advantages shine on long-distance drives: last year during a self-drive trip to Qinghai with three people and luggage, driving on plateaus with the AC on, it averaged 7.3L/100km. The break-in period is crucial—my fuel consumption was 10.5L/100km before the first service, but dropped to around 9L after 5,000 km. The older automatic transmission models consumed about 1L more than the manual ones, but the newer 8AT has improved significantly. Finally, some practical advice: if fuel economy is a priority, avoid the 4WD version—the standard front-wheel drive is sufficient; using 5W-30 oil is more fuel-efficient than 40 viscosity; and keep tire pressure no lower than 2.3Bar.