
smart fuel consumption ranges from 4.2 to 5.3L. Taking the smart fortwo 2019 0.9T 66kW Hardtop Pioneer Edition (China VI) as an example: The manufacturer of this car is smart, classified as a microcar, with a gasoline energy type, a 6-speed dual-clutch transmission, and a 3-door 2-seat hatchback body style, reaching a top speed of 155 km/h. The car's dimensions are 2695mm in length, 1663mm in width, and 1555mm in height, with a wheelbase of 1873mm. It features a turbocharged intake form, rear-engine rear-wheel drive, and both front and rear suspension types are MacPherson independent suspension.

I've been driving a Smart Fortwo for my daily commute for a year now, covering about 20 kilometers in the city each day. On average, the fuel consumption fluctuates around 5.5 liters per 100 kilometers, rising to just over 6 liters during peak traffic hours, and adding another 0.5 liters when the air conditioning is on. It's most fuel-efficient on highway trips during weekends, stabilizing at around 4.8 liters. The lightweight body indeed saves fuel, with a tank capacity of only 28 liters, but a full tank can take me over 500 kilometers. However, tire pressure needs frequent checking, as insufficient pressure can increase fuel consumption by 0.3 liters. This car is perfect for city commuting; its fuel efficiency in stop-and-go traffic is much better than that of larger displacement vehicles, saving me 300 yuan a month on fuel compared to my colleagues.

My smart is the 0.9T turbocharged version, mainly used for school runs. I've tested three driving conditions: during peak hours in traffic jams, fuel consumption is around 6.2L; on smooth ring roads, it drops to 5.3L; and on suburban roads, it stays at 5L. The small fuel tank turns out to be an advantage, forcing me to refuel frequently and not forget to track expenses. Using AC in summer has a noticeable impact, increasing consumption by 0.8L compared to spring/autumn. Once, a nail in the tire went unnoticed until fuel consumption suddenly jumped to 7L - the TPMS alert identified the cause. I recommend keeping a portable inflator. For a microcar, this fuel efficiency is above average, but the easy parking is a big plus.

Just came back from a self-driving trip, took my Smart for a long-distance drive. Covered 1,300 kilometers in total, a mix of highways and national roads, and calculated a combined fuel consumption of 4.9 liters per 100km during refueling. The most fuel-efficient was cruising on the highway at a constant speed, showing 4.3 liters per 100km at 90km/h. However, it quickly rose to 5.5 liters per 100km on steep mountain roads. In city driving, it usually stays between 5.2-5.7 liters per 100km, depending on traffic conditions. Some in the car owners' group reported fuel consumption exceeding 6 liters per 100km, mostly due to driving habits like sudden braking and acceleration, which are particularly fuel-intensive. My car is three years old, and sticking to regular maintenance has been key to maintaining fuel efficiency.

My wife's smart car is mainly used for grocery shopping, covering only about 7-8 kilometers daily. This car has relatively high fuel consumption during low-speed starts, reaching up to 7 liters per kilometer initially, but it drops to around 5 liters once it gets going. Short-distance usage isn't actually cost-effective, as cold starts consume the most fuel. Now, we've switched to ECO mode, and the fuel consumption has stabilized at approximately 5.6 liters. Although the fuel tank is small, frequent trips to the gas station are inconvenient, so we've started refueling on discount days. When the back seat is filled with shopping bags, fuel consumption increases by 0.3 liters, showing that the impact of weight is more significant than expected. Microcars are most economical with a single driver; fuel consumption noticeably rises with two or more passengers.


