
The official fuel consumption for the X-Trail without start-stop is 0.2 liters higher than the Qashqai, while the version with start-stop is slightly lower than the Qashqai. Below are specific details about fuel consumption: 1. Fuel consumption depends on driving habits: Aggressive braking, fluctuating speeds, prolonged engine idling, frequent acceleration, and long-distance driving at low gears with high speeds can all increase fuel consumption. 2. Principle of vehicle fuel consumption: The fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is an indicator of the vehicle. Driving slower than the economic speed increases fuel consumption per 100 kilometers, while driving faster than the economic speed has the opposite effect. If the engine speed is maintained within the same safe range, the hourly fuel consumption remains the same regardless of the vehicle's speed.

I have personally experienced the fuel consumption difference between the Qashqai and the X-Trail. When driving the Qashqai in the city, it generally maintains around 6 to 6.5 liters per 100 kilometers, which is quite fuel-efficient, making it easy on the wallet for daily commutes. Last year, I borrowed a friend's X-Trail for a long-distance trip, and even on the highway, it consumed about 7 liters, while in the city, it was even thirstier, reaching up to 7.5 liters. The difference is roughly 1 liter, mainly because the Qashqai has a lighter body and a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated engine, whereas the X-Trail has a 2.5-liter engine and a larger interior, adding several hundred kilograms in weight. On average, I spend about 800 yuan per month on fuel with the Qashqai, while the X-Trail costs over 900 yuan, saving a significant amount annually in the long run. Additionally, road conditions have a big impact—the difference is more noticeable in traffic jams. The Qashqai is ideal for city commuting, while the X-Trail excels in space and comfort, though higher fuel consumption is unavoidable. I recommend paying attention to driving habits during test drives—slow acceleration and fewer sudden brakes can help narrow the gap a bit.

From a technical perspective, the official combined fuel consumption of the Qashqai is typically rated around 6.2 liters per 100 kilometers, while the X-Trail's is slightly higher at approximately 7.5 liters, with a difference of about 1.3 liters. I've studied the engine specifications—the Qashqai uses a lighter 2.0-liter engine with a lower drag coefficient and better urban efficiency. The X-Trail, equipped with a 2.5-liter engine, delivers more torque but consumes more fuel, and its weight and drivetrain add to the burden. In real-world driving, the difference is less than 1 liter, especially on highways where the gap narrows to around 0.5 liters. Factors include transmission tuning: the Qashqai's CVT is smoother and more fuel-efficient, while the X-Trail's tuning leans toward performance. Both vehicles have similar fuel tank capacities—the Qashqai's 55 liters is slightly smaller than the X-Trail's 60 liters—but overall, the X-Trail consumes about 10% more fuel. When choosing between them, weigh this aspect: the Qashqai is economical and practical, while the X-Trail offers more features at a higher cost. ECO mode can improve efficiency for both, though such differences are normal among SUVs.

I've been paying attention to the fuel consumption difference for a long time. The Qashqai averages 6 liters per 100 kilometers, while the X-Trail is about 7 liters, a difference of around 1 liter. This directly affects car maintenance costs. The monthly fuel cost for the Qashqai is over 700 yuan, while the X-Trail reaches 850 yuan, resulting in an annual difference of nearly 2,000 yuan. Weight and engine size are the main factors. The Qashqai is lighter and more fuel-efficient, while the X-Trail is more stable but consumes slightly more. Maintaining a constant speed while driving is the most fuel-efficient way, which can halve the difference.


