What is the difference between x325i and 28i?

[VanElisa]

x325i and 28i differ in terms of power, price, and configuration. Here are the relevant details: 1. BMW x325i: The BMW x325i is a mid-size SUV equipped with an engine that delivers 184 horsepower and a maximum torque of 290 Nm. This engine can output maximum power at 5000 to 6500 rpm and maximum torque at 1350 to 4250 rpm. The engine features direct fuel injection technology and uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block. 2. BMW 28i: The 28i model is powered by a 2.0-liter turbocharged engine that produces 224 horsepower and a maximum torque of 310 Nm. The engine's maximum power is achieved at 5200 to 6500 rpm, and maximum torque is available at 1400 to 5000 rpm. This engine also features direct fuel injection technology and uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block.

[StBrianna]

To be honest, I prefer discussing a car's performance. The X3 25i and 28i are both part of the BMW X3 series, but the key difference lies in their engine performance. The 28i typically delivers between 230 to 248 horsepower, offering quicker acceleration—0 to 100 km/h in around 6 seconds, which makes driving exhilarating. In comparison, the 25i's horsepower ranges from 180 to 210, with slower acceleration, taking about 8 seconds for the same sprint. For daily driving, if you enjoy spirited driving, the 28i is more thrilling, especially when overtaking on highways. Additionally, the suspension tuning might slightly differ, with the 28i leaning more towards sportiness and sharper gear-shift responses. However, the 25i is slightly more fuel-efficient, making it more economical for city driving. In short, the performance gap is quite noticeable, and the choice depends on your driving habits. If you frequently take long trips, I’d definitely recommend the 28i.

[Cruz]

As an average car owner, I believe practicality for daily use is more important. The main difference between the X3 25i and 28i lies in engine power. The 28i's 230 horsepower is better suited for scenarios requiring stronger acceleration, but it consumes slightly more fuel—around 8 liters per 100 km, compared to the 25i's roughly 7 liters, making the latter more economical for city driving. In terms of features, both models are nearly identical, offering comforts like premium seats and navigation systems, with a price difference of maybe tens of thousands. I test-drove the 25i and found it perfectly adequate for grocery runs and school pickups—its acceleration may be less thrilling, but it doesn’t compromise safety. Over time, the 28i incurs slightly higher tire wear and maintenance costs. If budgeting carefully, the 25i offers better value. After all, a daily commuter doesn’t need extreme power—safety and reliability matter most.

[SanSara]

From a technical perspective, these two models are actually platform derivatives. Both employ a 2.0T turbocharged engine, but different ECU tuning results in power output variations: the 28i delivers approximately 230 kW maximum power, while the 25i is detuned to 180 kW with slightly weaker torque. Both use ZF's 8-speed automatic transmission with identical responsiveness, though the 28i exhibits quieter operation at high RPMs and potentially cleaner emissions. Subtle internal engine modifications - such as piston strength and cooling system design - affect longevity and maintenance intervals. The 25i demonstrates superior efficiency during low-load operation, making it better suited for urban congestion with reduced overheating concerns during prolonged use. The primary daily driving distinction lies in power delivery characteristics, with the 25i offering more progressive acceleration.