
Wuling Rongguang and Rongguang S are quite similar, but they differ in configurations. The Rongguang S is a newer model with better materials, aiming to build a good reputation. Overall, the Rongguang S is better, and we recommend the Rongguang 1.5S for its sufficient power and advanced timing chain engine. More details are as follows: 1. Introduction: The Wuling Rongguang is a microvan under the Wuling brand. Its dimensions are 4135 mm in length, 1625 mm in width, and 1870 mm in height, with a wheelbase of 2700 mm. The Wuling Rongguang is equipped with two engines: a 1.2L naturally aspirated engine and a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine. 2. Configuration: The front suspension of the Wuling Rongguang uses a MacPherson independent suspension, while the rear suspension employs a longitudinal leaf spring non-independent suspension. Most microvans use leaf spring suspensions for the rear.

I used to deliver goods with the Wuling Rongguang, and this year I switched to the Rongguang S. The differences between the two are quite noticeable. The Rongguang S has a wider and longer body, allowing the cargo compartment to hold over a dozen more boxes. The chassis has also been reinforced, so it doesn’t creak when carrying heavy loads. The engine has been upgraded to a new 1.5L, providing much quicker acceleration—I don’t have to floor the throttle on the highway anymore. However, fuel consumption is about 0.5L higher than the older model. The headlights have been upgraded to with lenses, making night drives on rural roads much brighter, and the center console now includes a USB charging port, eliminating the need for a cigarette lighter adapter. That said, it’s 8,000 RMB more expensive, so if you’re only hauling light cargo, the older model might still be the more cost-effective choice.

Having repaired Wuling vehicles for five years, I can say the Hongguang and Hongguang S differ significantly in structure. The older Hongguang used a B-series engine, while the Hongguang S upgraded to a P-TEC engine with redesigned piston rings and fuel injectors, greatly improving carbon buildup issues. The steering system shifted from mechanical hydraulic to electric power assistance, making steering much lighter when stationary, but the circuitry is more complex—replacing a steering gear assembly costs an extra two hundred. Although both use leaf spring rear suspensions, the S model added damping rubber blocks, reducing vibrations on rough roads. The brake discs are half a centimeter larger, noticeably improving braking performance, but rear brake pads still require inspection every three months as they wear quickly when hauling heavy loads.

I operate intercity passenger transport and have driven both models. The most practical feature of the Glory S is its interior space, with the second row capable of sliding 15 cm forward and backward, making it much easier for passengers to stow luggage. The old Glory model only had manual window cranks, while the S model comes with front power windows, so you don't need to lean over to open windows in the rain. The ground clearance is 2 cm higher, providing more stability when driving through waterlogged roads during the rainy season. The number of AC vents has increased from 4 to 6, so rear passengers won't complain about the heat in summer. Although both models have two speakers, the S model supports connectivity, making it convenient to use phone navigation while picking up passengers. As for drawbacks, the S model's body is slightly wider, requiring extra caution when passing through narrow alleys in old urban areas.

Last year when I bought the Rongguang S, I carefully compared the two models. In terms of exterior, the S model features a chrome-trimmed grille and more angular bumper lines, while the older version looks like a square box. The biggest difference lies in the interior—the S model comes with faux leather seat upholstery and soft-touch door panels, whereas the older version is all hard plastic. The instrument cluster has been upgraded to a self-illuminating type, making it visible at night without turning on the lights. Safety features now include ABS and EBD, preventing skidding during rainy-day braking, which the older model lacked. Storage compartments are more thoughtfully designed, with a new card slot added to the left of the steering wheel for easy access to delivery slips when hauling goods. One regret is that the S model removed the passenger sun visor vanity mirror from the older version, something my wife often complains about.

After working in the auto trade city for a long time, customers are most concerned about the cost performance of these two models. The entry-level version of the old Guang starts at just over 40,000 yuan, suitable for small business owners just starting out, with low costs thanks to its leaf spring rear suspension. The Guang S is about 7,000 to 8,000 yuan more expensive, but it comes with additional features like airbags and a rear parking radar, as well as heated rearview mirrors, significantly improving driving safety in rainy conditions. The engine sound insulation is thicker, reducing idle noise by about 5 decibels. The fuel tank capacity has been increased from 40 liters to 45 liters, reducing the number of refueling stops on long trips. The tire specification has been upgraded from 175/70 to 185/65, providing better grip. The key is to consider your needs: choose the old model for pure cargo hauling, while the S model is more suitable if you also need to carry passengers.


