
Here are the differences between VX and TX: 1. Different versions: TX is the low-end version, which is further divided into models with and without a sunroof, meaning there are base and standard models within the low-end version; VX is the high-end version, which is further divided into fabric and leather, meaning there are premium and top-tier models. 2. Different interiors: VX features leather seats and an LCD instrument panel, while TX does not. 3. Different powertrains: VX is the 4.0-liter luxury version, equipped with Toyota's 1GR engine. The VX also comes with a four-link suspension system (with KDSS + stabilizer bar). TX is the 4.0-liter low-end version.

As someone who frequently interacts with various car models, I've noticed that the TX and VX mainly differ in terms of configuration and features. The TX is typically the base or mid-range version of the Toyota Prado, featuring fabric seats, a standard audio system, and smaller wheels, making it suitable for budget-conscious users or off-road enthusiasts. It's rugged and durable but relatively simple. In contrast, the VX is the luxury version, upgraded with leather seats, a premium navigation system, larger wheels, and more safety features like automatic braking and lane assist, offering a more comfortable and luxurious driving experience, especially noticeable in urban settings. Price-wise, the VX is about 50,000 to 80,000 RMB more expensive than the TX, but this extra cost brings significant convenience for daily commutes and long-distance travel. If you're after value for money, the TX is sufficient; but if you want to enjoy a refined lifestyle, the VX is a better investment. Also, during maintenance, pay extra attention to checking electronic devices to avoid minor malfunctions disrupting your trips.

I think the price difference between the TX and VX is worth discussing, especially from the perspective of someone who has driven both models multiple times. The VX is tens of thousands more expensive than the TX, but the added value depends on usage habits. For city commuting, the VX's heated seats and automatic climate control are particularly enjoyable, and the air purification system is a thoughtful addition on smoggy days. On the other hand, the TX comes with all the essential features, has relatively lower fuel consumption, and is more suitable for hardcore off-road enthusiasts who frequently tackle rough terrain. In the long run, both vehicles offer equally powerful performance and engines, with similar fuel consumption and minimal differences in maintenance costs. However, the money saved on the TX can be invested in off-road accessories. I recommend beginners or family users opt for the VX to enhance driving pleasure, while experienced drivers can maximize the practical potential of the TX. When choosing, consider your budget and daily driving conditions—don’t blindly chase the higher trim.

From a driving needs perspective, I observed clear distinctions between the TX and VX. The VX excels in urban driving with its sofa-like soft suspension for comfort and minimal noise; while the TX demonstrates robust off-road capability, handling rough terrain effortlessly. The key lies in usage scenarios: commuters benefit more from the VX's convenience features like electronic dashboards and one-button start, whereas outdoor adventurers find the TX more dependable with its simple mechanical systems that rarely fail. Both share similar engines and 4WD systems with negligible fuel consumption differences, though the TX incurs lower maintenance costs long-term, whereas the VX's smart systems may occasionally require adjustments. Choose based on your itinerary—don’t let redundant features weigh you down.


