What is the difference between the Leiling plug-in hybrid and the dual-engine hybrid?
3 Answers
The biggest difference between the current dual-engine hybrid and plug-in hybrid is that one uses an oil-electric hybrid power system, while the other employs a plug-in hybrid power system. In other aspects, there is essentially no difference. More relevant information is as follows: 1. Dual-engine hybrid: The so-called dual-engine hybrid refers to two power systems that can independently provide driving power to the car. When the electric motor has power, it uses the electric motor to drive the car. When the power runs out, the internal combustion engine power system takes over to provide power. Both power systems work independently to directly power the car, so in terms of performance, the user experience is more robust and not significantly different from the traditional fuel cars users are accustomed to, requiring no readjustment. 2. Plug-in hybrid: The plug-in hybrid uses the electric motor as the primary power system, while the internal combustion engine system only charges the car's power battery pack. Therefore, in terms of exhaust emissions and environmental protection, the plug-in hybrid plays a more substantial role. Additionally, since it relies more on the electric motor for power, it offers a quieter driving experience for users. In fact, whether it's the dual-engine hybrid or the plug-in hybrid, they are merely transitional models in the development of new energy vehicles. The ultimate goal of new energy vehicle development will be pure electric vehicle models, as the primary objective of promoting new energy vehicles is environmental protection. Hence, pure electric new energy vehicles, which produce almost no exhaust pollution, are undoubtedly the final choice for the development of the new energy vehicle industry.
I've been driving the hybrid version for three years now, and back then I compared it with the plug-in hybrid version. The hybrid is the most worry-free, used just like a regular gasoline car, with a small battery that doesn't require charging, and fuel consumption stays stable at around 4.5 liters per 100 kilometers. A full tank of gas lasts me two weeks of commuting. The plug-in hybrid costs over 20,000 yuan more, has a significantly larger battery that can be charged, and can run about 50 kilometers on pure electric power, making it suitable for friends with fixed parking spots to install charging stations. However, its trunk space is reduced because the battery takes up room, and my colleague complained about struggling to fit a baby stroller. If you frequently drive long distances, the plug-in hybrid's fuel consumption when the battery is depleted is actually higher than the hybrid's. After weighing the pros and cons, I think the regular hybrid is more economical, especially for those without charging conditions—the convenience of the hybrid is truly unmatched.
The fact that plug-in hybrids can get green license plates was a major selling point for me, as I bought it primarily for the unlimited driving privileges. The government waives the purchase tax and offers subsidies, saving me 20,000 to 30,000 yuan compared to a hybrid with a blue license plate. However, the trade-off is that you must charge it regularly, which can be troublesome if your residential area lacks charging stations. The pure electric range of 50 kilometers is only sufficient for urban commuting, and you'll need to rely on gasoline for longer trips back home. On the other hand, hybrids don't require charging and have a fuel consumption of just over 5 liters, offering better stability but missing out on policy benefits. I've also noticed that plug-in hybrids accelerate quietly and powerfully when fully charged, but the engine noise becomes quite noticeable when the battery is low. In my opinion, plug-in hybrids are the best choice for cities with driving restrictions, while hybrids are more hassle-free in other regions.