What is the difference between the 2-seater and 4-seater Chery Ant?
4 Answers
The difference between the 2-seater and 4-seater Chery Ant lies in the space: the 2-seater has a more compact interior, while the 4-seater offers greater comfort, which is also reflected in the body dimensions and wheelbase. The 2-seater Ant measures 3200/1670/1550mm in length/width/height with a 2150mm wheelbase, making it a true "microcar". In contrast, the 4-seater version has dimensions of 3495/1660/1560mm and a 2475mm wheelbase. Additional details: 1. Front view: The new Chery Ant features a simple design with a fully enclosed grille. The headlights on both sides have a complex internal structure and relatively large size, showcasing strong design aesthetics. 2. Rear view: The waistline adopts an upward-sloping posture, complemented by uniquely styled wheels. The taillights are small square-shaped, while the turn signals feature a "T-shaped" design. The rear bumper incorporates a large silver-white decorative panel, and the exhaust pipes are hidden.
As a driving enthusiast who commutes in the city year-round, I’ve owned a Chery Ant for two years. The main differences between the 2-seater and 4-seater versions lie in space and practicality. First, the 4-seater is about half a meter longer, with an extended wheelbase that accommodates small rear seats, making it suitable for occasional trips with family or friends. The 2-seater, on the other hand, is extremely compact, making it particularly convenient for navigating narrow residential roads or turning and parking in mall basements without needing to adjust the wheels repeatedly. For daily use, the 2-seater offers slightly more trunk space than the 4-seater, easily fitting shopping bags or small luggage. The 4-seater’s rear seats can fold flat to create temporary extra space, but luggage capacity is limited when passengers are seated. In terms of weight, the 4-seater is dozens of kilograms heavier, making acceleration or uphill starts slightly slower, though overall performance remains unaffected; city stoplight responsiveness is equally sharp. Safety is comparable—the 4-seater has rear-seat protection, but low-speed collisions aren’t an issue for either. Handling-wise, the 2-seater is nimble and playful, offering a go-kart-like thrill, while the 4-seater feels steadier and more reassuring at higher speeds. The choice depends on needs: for singles or pure commuting, the 2-seater is cost-effective and hassle-free; for small families or multi-passenger needs, the 4-seater is the way to go.
As a family man with young kids, I chose the Chery Ant 4-seater version specifically for that extra small rear seat. The two kids can squeeze into the compact backseat space, and the seat cushion comfort is decent—far superior to the 2-seater version with no rear seats at all. The 4-seater body is slightly longer, requiring a bit more maneuvering when parking in the city, but it’s much more convenient for school drop-offs and pickups, with well-designed rear doors that don’t get in the way. The trunk is noticeably smaller than the 2-seater’s, just enough for backpacks and snacks, but larger items require folding the seats. Safety-wise, the reinforced rear structure gives me peace of mind; the added weight slightly reduces range by a few kilometers, but overnight charging handles it easily, so daily use isn’t affected. The price is a bit higher than the 2-seater, but worth it for family outings. The 2-seater’s larger trunk suits solo adventurers, but it’s useless for carrying passengers. Driving feel is nearly identical between the two—just as smooth in city traffic. Overall, the Ant is reliable, and I’d recommend families with kids go straight for the 4-seater.
As a frugal commuter, I analyzed the cost differences between the two car models. The 2-seater version is a few thousand dollars cheaper, lighter in weight, saves a bit on electricity, and offers slightly more range. The 4-seater is more expensive but adds seating capacity, with insurance and maintenance costs being similar, and possibly a slightly higher residual value due to growing demand. In terms of energy consumption, the 4-seater is heavier and consumes a bit more electricity, though this isn't significant for city use. The core differences lie in space and practicality: the 2-seater has a larger trunk and is more convenient for single occupants, while the 4-seater can accommodate a small family but has limited cargo space. Driving dynamics are almost identical for both—light and agile. I chose the 2-seater purely for cost savings, maximizing commuting efficiency.
