What is the difference between Prado and Land Cruiser?
4 Answers
The differences between Prado and Land Cruiser: 1. Different dimensions: Prado has a body length, width, and height of 4840mm, 1885mm, and 1890mm respectively; Land Cruiser has a body length, width, and height of 5095mm, 1975mm, and 1930mm respectively. 2. Different transmissions: Prado is equipped with a 6-speed automatic manual transmission; Land Cruiser is equipped with a 5-speed automatic manual transmission. 3. Different engines: Prado is powered by a 3.5L naturally aspirated engine with a maximum power of 206kw and a peak torque of 365nm; Land Cruiser is powered by a 4.0L naturally aspirated engine with a maximum power of 202kw and a peak torque of 385nm.
I often go on road trips and have experienced both the Prado and Land Cruiser, with deep impressions. The Prado, commonly known as the 'Badao' in China, is moderately sized, leaning towards the smaller side, making it agile for city driving and easy to park. The space is sufficient, with the rear seats comfortably accommodating three people, and it's fuel-efficient for daily commutes, averaging around 10 liters per 100 kilometers. The Land Cruiser, on the other hand, is a big guy from the Land Cruiser series, with more hardcore off-road performance—steady as a rock on rough roads or when climbing mountains. However, its large size makes turning in urban areas more challenging, and it consumes significantly more fuel, so you’ll need to budget more for fuel on long trips. There's a big price gap between them: the Prado is cheaper to buy new and more affordable to maintain, while the Land Cruiser is more expensive but more durable and holds its value better. Overall, if you're like me and enjoy mild adventures plus daily use, the Prado is sufficient; but if you're serious about conquering the wilderness, the Land Cruiser is worth the investment.
I've been driving the Prado in the city for several years now, and compared to my friend's Land Cruiser, the differences are obvious. The Prado doesn't feel bulky, making it easy to navigate through rush hour traffic, and it has good fuel efficiency, averaging around 12 liters per 100 km. The interior is comfortable and practical, with seats that don't tire you out. The Land Cruiser, on the other hand, is too big—I'm always worried about scraping the sides on narrow roads, and the fuel consumption spikes to 14-15 liters per 100 km, making daily expenses higher. While it has spacious rear seats that can even allow someone to lie down, this space is usually wasted. I think the Prado is more affordable, with entry-level models costing about one-third less, and maintenance is hassle-free. The Land Cruiser excels in cargo capacity, making it suitable for hauling or family trips. Based on my experience, the Prado is the smarter choice for city living; the Land Cruiser is better left for professional enthusiasts.
I've driven several Toyota models, and both the Prado and Land Cruiser are great but differ in maintenance. The Prado is easy for minor repairs with affordable parts and often stays trouble-free. The Land Cruiser has a robust engine that can withstand a decade of wear, but its high fuel consumption adds up over time, though it excels in off-road stability. If you're on a tight budget, the Prado is cost-effective and reliable. For extreme performance, the Land Cruiser is worth every penny.
