
Mainly manifested in the difference of the rear axle, one is a G axle and the other is a D axle. The following is more introduction about the rear axle: 1. Introduction: The rear axle refers to the rear drive axle component of the vehicle's power transmission. It consists of two half-axles that can implement differential movement. At the same time, it is also a device used to support the wheels and connect the rear wheels. For front-wheel drive vehicles, the rear axle is merely a tag axle, serving only a load-bearing function. If the front axle is not the drive axle, then the rear axle becomes the drive axle, in which case it not only bears the load but also serves the functions of driving, deceleration, and differential. 2. Classification: Rear axles are divided into solid axles and semi-axles. Solid axles are paired with non-independent suspensions, such as leaf spring suspensions, while semi-axles are paired with independent suspensions, such as MacPherson suspensions.

I've been using Lovol tractors for several years, and the main difference between the 1304 and 1354 models lies in their horsepower. The 1304 typically has 130 horsepower, while the 1354 offers 135 horsepower. The numerical difference may seem small, but in actual fieldwork, the 1354 feels noticeably stronger in terms of traction, especially when climbing slopes or working on hard soil, where its efficiency is significantly higher. In terms of fuel consumption, the 1354, with its higher horsepower, naturally consumes more fuel. However, for larger plots or continuous days of work, it completes tasks faster, saving time. Additionally, the engine tuning differs between the two models. The 1304 is more suitable for small farms or flat terrains, offering smoother operation and reducing operator fatigue. On the other hand, the 1354 features a more robust gearbox, making it ideal for large, contiguous fields or heavy-duty hauling. Price-wise, the 1354 is about 10,000 to 20,000 RMB more expensive, but it offers better long-term value for money. In terms of cab design, the 1354 usually comes with more additional features, such as air conditioning and enhanced suspension systems, making long-distance operation more comfortable. In conclusion, the choice between the two depends on your land conditions and budget, and I recommend test-driving both to personally experience the differences.

As an agricultural machinery enthusiast, I've studied the details of the Lovol 1304 and 1354 tractors. The most noticeable difference lies in engine output: the 1304 delivers around 130 horsepower, while the 1354 reaches 135 horsepower. Though only a 5-horsepower gap, their torque curve designs differ significantly. The 1354 provides stronger low-RPM pulling power for stable heavy-load operations, whereas the 1304 offers smoother mid-range performance. Functionally, the 1354 typically features more advanced hydraulics with 20% greater lifting capacity for heavy implements, plus an upgraded digital dashboard for more intuitive monitoring of oil pressure and coolant temperature. Transmission configurations vary too: the 1304 usually has 8 forward and 2 reverse gears, while the 1354's 12x4 setup enables sharper field turns. Fuel consumption tests show the 1354 uses 0.5L more per 100km under full load but achieves 10%+ faster operation speeds. Maintenance costs are comparable with strong parts commonality. For heavy-duty work or hilly terrain, the 1354 proves more practical; in flatlands, the 1304 delivers better cost efficiency. Terrain consideration matters more than specs alone when choosing between them.

I've worked on the farm for several years and find the differences between the Lovol 1304 and 1354 pretty straightforward. In terms of horsepower, the 1304 is slightly lower, around 130 HP, while the 1354 goes up to 135 HP, mainly affecting work speed. The 1304 is lighter and simpler to operate, making it suitable for beginners or small-scale tasks like plowing small plots or transport. On the other hand, the 1354 has more power, making it easier to pull plows and handle continuous work in large fields without strain. Size differences: the 1354 has a wider wheelbase for better stability, but turning on narrow ridges might be tricky; the 1304 is more compact, flexible for maneuvering through woods or small plots. Fuel consumption-wise, the 1354 uses more fuel but is more efficient, covering more land in a day. Price-wise, the 1354 is slightly more expensive, but the return on investment is quicker. Additional features like air conditioning are more likely to be standard on the 1354, while the 1304 might lack this in basic versions. For daily use, if the land isn't steep, the 1304 is sufficient; for hilly areas, the 1354 is the better choice. It's advisable to check the official manual for detailed parameter comparisons.


