
There are mainly the following differences between Level 2 and Level 3 assisted driving systems: 1. Level 2: Level 2 autonomous driving possesses many prototype functions of autonomous vehicles, such as full-speed automatic assisted driving, automatic assisted driving in traffic congestion, automatic hazard prediction braking, etc. However, most of the time, the driver still needs to take the lead in driving the vehicle, and only under specific circumstances can the driver temporarily take their hands off the steering wheel. 2. Level 3: Under Level 3, the vehicle can achieve autonomous driving in most road conditions, taking over a significant portion of the driving functions. However, in the Level 3 stage, the driver still needs to remain vigilant at all times to take over the vehicle promptly in case of emergencies.

I've always driven cars with driver assistance, and people often ask me about the difference between L2 and L3. Simply put, L2 is partial automation, like adaptive cruise control paired with lane keeping, where the car can accelerate, decelerate, and steer on its own. But I can't fully relax—my hands must stay on the wheel, eyes on the road, ready to take over at any moment in case of unexpected situations. L3 is much more advanced. In specific scenarios like highways, the system fully handles the driving tasks, allowing me to briefly take my hands off and do other things, with the system notifying me when to take back control. The key difference is monitoring responsibility: with L2, I'm on high alert the entire time, while with L3, I can ease up in designated areas. However, it's important to note that L3 relies on a suite of advanced sensors and software, like cameras and radar, which have low error rates but aren't entirely foolproof, so I only use it in safe conditions. Overall, L2 is more common and economical, while L3 suits high-end enthusiasts.

As a daily driver, I feel the difference between L2 and L3 directly impacts my driving experience. With L2, features like adaptive cruise control and lane centering assist with acceleration and deceleration, but I still need to hold the steering wheel and monitor the road. While it reduces fatigue on long trips, I always stay alert. With L3, the system can navigate automatically under specific conditions, like in heavy highway traffic where I can take my hands off, and the system will prompt me to take over when needed. This gives me peace of mind, but it only works under permitted conditions—it's not foolproof. The reality is: L2 works on various roads with low barriers, while L3 is limited by regulations and scenarios, offering fewer opportunities to use it. I remember once on the highway when L3 freed my hands—it was great—but over-reliance can be risky, so it's best to understand the system's limits clearly.

From a safety perspective, the divide between L2 and L3 is significant. With L2 systems assisting in driving, I remain responsible for monitoring and intervention, and any accidents are primarily my fault. After L3 operates automatically in specific environments, the system temporarily assumes responsibility, but if it fails, I must quickly take over. This introduces risks: mistakenly believing L3 is infallible can lead to delayed responses. For example, L3 may work on highways, but the system might fail in poor weather. It's advisable to undergo training before use and not neglect maintaining distance and emergency plans. L3 represents major progress but remains unstable.


