
The differences between Intelligent Navigation System and Adaptive Cruise Control are: 1. Intelligence Level: Cruise control operates at a speed set by the driver. When this function is activated, the vehicle maintains a constant speed. This feature was originally designed to reduce driver fatigue during long-distance driving, minimize unnecessary speed changes, save fuel, and improve fuel economy. Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) is more advanced than traditional cruise control, building upon its technology. It incorporates additional sensors, such as radar, around the vehicle to detect obstacles within a certain range in real-time. After processing by the onboard computer, the system can take actions like decelerating. 2. Usage Conditions: The Intelligent Navigation System is primarily suitable for providing driving assistance on well-maintained roads like highways or elevated roads, and is not recommended for urban roads or mountainous terrain. 3. Operation: When Adaptive Cruise Control is activated, the system maintains a set following distance from the vehicle ahead. However, it does not include lane-keeping functionality, requiring the driver to manually steer the vehicle.

Once you've driven a car with these two features, the difference becomes quite obvious. Adaptive Cruise Control mainly manages the throttle and brakes. After setting the speed and following distance, it can automatically adjust the speed to follow the car ahead, making highway driving more relaxing. However, you still need to steer the wheel yourself. Intelligent Navigation is much more advanced—it not only controls the speed but also uses cameras and radar to monitor lane markings, keeping the car centered in the lane on highways or closed roads. You just need to rest your hands lightly on the wheel without exerting much effort to steer, as it handles both direction and speed for you. Of course, it will still prompt you to take over in complex road conditions or sharp turns. Simply put, one only manages distance and speed, while the other also helps with steering to keep you from crossing the line.

From my daily driving experience, I can feel the differences. Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) is like a smart following assistant that can automatically stop and go in traffic jams to prevent rear-end collisions, but you have to steer the wheel yourself the whole time, and you still need to turn the wheel manually on sharp curves. Intelligent Cruise Control can recognize lane markings via the front camera, allowing the car to automatically steer within the lane lines during highway cruising, but you can't take your hands off the wheel for too long. Last week when I used this function on the elevated road during rain, I clearly saw the steering wheel icon on the dashboard making minor adjustments. The biggest difference in practice is: ACC only relieves foot fatigue, while Intelligent Cruise Control relieves both hand and foot fatigue. However, I always choose to drive manually in rain or snow.

The key lies in the control dimensions. Adaptive cruise control only manages longitudinal movement, adjusting the distance to the vehicle ahead via radar. Intelligent navigation adds lateral control, utilizing cameras to maintain lane centering. It's like the former only handles acceleration and deceleration for distance control, while the latter additionally takes over minor steering adjustments. There's also a difference in system response speed. Intelligent navigation requires dual information fusion processing between camera-recognized lane markings and radar-detected preceding vehicles, resulting in approximately a 0.5-second delay when encountering unclear road markings or sudden lane changes by the preceding vehicle. Although it offers a more relaxed experience on highways, it's not recommended for use in severe weather conditions or on urban roads with unclear markings.

Previously, there were cases of system misjudgment during vehicle maintenance. A driver experienced vehicle deviation after enabling Intelligent Pilot Assist due to worn reflective markings on a nighttime highway, but fortunately, the driver intervened in time. This highlights that, beyond basic functional differences, Intelligent Pilot Assist heavily relies on lane marking recognition capabilities, whereas Adaptive Cruise Control only requires radar detection of the vehicle ahead to operate. From a cost perspective, Intelligent Pilot Assist demands higher hardware specifications, including at least three cameras and long-range radar, with higher calibration costs in the long run. It is recommended that new owners test the steering sensitivity in open areas before use, especially noting that lane recognition capability can decrease by more than 50% in rainy conditions.


