
The differences between Han DM-i and DM are as follows: 1. Different advantages: DM-i has multiple advantages that lead other hybrid technologies, and its "core idea" is to prioritize electricity and use fuel as a supplement. In terms of architecture, the DM-i super hybrid is based on a high-capacity battery and high-power motor, relying on the high-power motor for driving during vehicle operation. The gasoline engine in Han DM primarily functions to charge the battery and only directly drives when additional power is needed, working in coordination with the motor to reduce load. This hybrid technology differs from traditional hybrid technologies that rely on the engine, enabling more effective fuel consumption reduction. 2. Different core technical components: The core component of DM-i super hybrid technology is BYD's newly developed Xiaoyun plug-in hybrid dedicated engine, which comes in two versions—the 1.5L engine is mainly used in Qin PLUS and Song PLUS, while the 1.5T turbocharged engine in DM is used in larger models like Tang DM-i.

As an automotive enthusiast, I'm fascinated by technical details. The main differences between the BYD Han DM-i and DM lie in their drivetrain designs: The DM-i employs intelligent hybrid technology where the gasoline engine primarily serves as a generator, prioritizing electric motor propulsion. This achieves remarkably low fuel consumption of around 4L/100km in urban traffic, delivering ultra-smooth and quiet operation with lower maintenance costs. The DM, however, features a dual-mode system where the engine can directly drive the wheels, providing stronger explosive power and noticeable acceleration push during high-speed driving. Regarding battery charging, the DM-i supports fast charging for greater convenience, while the DM's dual-mode system consumes electricity faster during aggressive driving. When choosing, if you primarily commute or drive frequently in urban areas, the DM-i offers better fuel efficiency and practicality. For those pursuing high-speed performance and driving excitement, the DM delivers more thrilling performance. Ultimately, the core difference boils down to economy versus performance orientation - your decision should be based on your specific usage scenarios.

I've been driving the BYD Han for a long time, and I feel the main differences between DM-i and DM lie in cost savings and efficiency. The DM-i emphasizes fuel economy, with excellent fuel-saving effects, especially in short-distance urban driving where it can save a lot of money. In the long run, maintenance and fuel costs are lower. The DM offers stronger performance but higher fuel consumption, leading to higher daily expenses. In actual driving, the DM-i requires slightly less frequent charging, the engine intervention is smooth, and there's minimal noise, providing a strong sense of comfort. The DM has ample power but occasionally experiences jerky movements. Considering the rapid rise in fuel prices these days, the DM-i is more suitable for average family users or commuters, as it reduces worries about fuel costs. The DM, on the other hand, is better suited for car enthusiasts or those with high-speed needs. The two models have different positioning—one prioritizes practicality, the other speed.

After test driving the BYD Han, I can say directly: the DM-i drives like a pure electric car, smooth and quiet; the DM feels more like a sports car, with explosive acceleration when you step on the throttle. The difference lies in their primary roles: the DM-i is mainly electric, saving fuel at low speeds in the city; the DM's engine can directly deliver power, offering fierce acceleration but with higher fuel consumption. In terms of driving pleasure, the DM is much more stable in corners or when overtaking; the DM-i is smooth and easy, quiet when stopping at lights. It depends on your style: if you commute daily seeking comfort, go for the DM-i; if you love speeding or frequent highway driving, the DM is more exciting.


