What is the difference between GLE and GLS?

[DiAniyah]

The differences between GLE and GLS are: 1. Different vehicle types: The GLE is positioned as a mid-to-large-size car; the GLS is positioned as a full-size large SUV. 2. Different platforms: The GLE is built on the older ML platform; the GLS is a large SUV built on the S-Class platform. 3. Different space performance: The GLE has five-seater and seven-seater versions, with the five-seater being more suitable for commercial reception; the GLS is exclusively a seven-seater model with very spacious interior. In terms of appearance, the GLS has a length, width, and height of 5214mm, 1956mm, and 1823mm respectively, with a wheelbase of 3135mm; the GLE has a length, width, and height of 4941mm, 2018mm, and 1782mm, with a wheelbase of 2995mm.

[LaGenesis]

As a dad who frequently takes the whole family on trips, I feel the biggest difference between the GLE and GLS is the sense of space. The GLE is a midsize SUV, perfect for small families like ours—comfortably seating three to four people, with a trunk that can fit a stroller or luggage. But the GLS is a full-size beast with three rows of seats, making it much easier to bring along an extra kid or two without squeezing, and offering significantly more legroom. From a driving perspective, the GLE is more agile and better suited for city parking, while the GLS drives like a tank—stable on highways but a bit cumbersome on turns. Price-wise, the GLS is usually considerably more expensive, with higher fuel consumption. When I test-drove the GLS last time, I felt the extra cost was justified, especially enjoying features like heated seats and acoustic glass on long trips. The choice depends on family needs—if you want to save money and don’t travel long distances often, the GLE is more economical; if you’re always traveling with a full load, the GLS is the way to go.

[SanTeagan]

Having driven both models several times, I'd say the differences between the GLE and GLS primarily lie in power and handling. The GLE leans towards a sportier tuning with quicker acceleration response – the AMG version can even deliver some thrilling G-force, making it ideal for younger drivers who enjoy showing off on intercity highways. The GLS feels more composed, with its heavier body feeling less agile around corners compared to the GLE, but it offers smoother starts. Coupled with the optional 4MATIC system, its off-road capability outshines the GLE. Fuel consumption-wise, the GLE is more economical at around 12L/100km, while the GLS tends to guzzle over 15L/100km. Maintenance costs also differ significantly – my friend's GLS costs hundreds more per service. Overall, the GLE suits individuals or couples seeking driving excitement with occasional luggage space, whereas the GLS is designed for large families, trading some agility for a more luxurious experience.

[McCameron]

I prioritize tech features, and there's a clear distinction between the GLE and GLS in terms of intelligent systems. The GLE's touchscreen and infotainment functions are quite modern, though the screen size is average. The GLS, on the other hand, comes with a larger widescreen display that supports gesture control and wireless phone projection, offering a more immersive experience. In terms of driving assistance, the GLS adds lane-keeping and an upgraded automatic parking system, which is particularly helpful for beginners to free their hands in traffic jams. Safety-wise, the GLS also takes the lead with standard night vision and more airbags. However, the base model of the GLE is more affordable, and the entry-level version might lack these fancy features. As someone who frequently tests new cars, I'd say the GLE is practical enough; but with a sufficient budget, the futuristic appeal of the GLS is truly tempting.