What is the difference between Geely BMA and CMA?
2 Answers
Difference lies in the R&D parties. The CMA architecture was jointly developed by Geely and Volvo, while the BMA architecture was independently developed by Geely Auto. Below are the relevant introductions: 1. BMA: The BMA architecture has four main features, namely supporting the development of multiple vehicle types, high space utilization, compatibility with various powertrains, and excellent safety performance. 2. CMA: The CMA architecture is primarily used for developing compact vehicles, capable of meeting the R&D needs of various models from A-segment compact cars to B-segment SUVs. Inheriting the safety performance of Volvo's SPA architecture, which is renowned as "the world's safest," vehicles built on this architecture offer strong safety guarantees.
I've done in-depth research on automotive modular platforms, and the fundamental differences between BMA and CMA lie in their design philosophies and target vehicle models. CMA was jointly developed by Geely and Volvo, used in premium series like Lynk & Co and the Volvo XC40, with exceptionally high safety standards. Its electronic architecture supports electrification and autonomous driving features, offering a smooth and quiet ride but at a higher cost. BMA, on the other hand, was independently developed by Geely for entry-level models such as the Bin Yue, focusing more on flexibility and cost-effectiveness, making it easier to manufacture conventional fuel vehicles that are economical for daily use but technologically less advanced than CMA. In terms of driving experience, CMA's chassis is robust and capable of filtering out bumps, while BMA is lighter and more suited for city driving, though it falls short in long-distance comfort. Looking ahead, CMA will increasingly involve new energy vehicle models, whereas BMA will focus on the economical and practical line. These differences directly impact pricing and maintenance costs—opt for CMA if you're after premium features, and BMA for entry-level affordability.
