What is the Difference Between Full-Speed Adaptive Cruise Control and Adaptive Cruise Control?
2 Answers
Full-speed adaptive cruise control and adaptive cruise control differ as follows: Speed limitations vary: Full-speed adaptive cruise control can be used at any speed; adaptive cruise control can only be used above 40 km/h or 60 km/h. Nature differs: Full-speed adaptive cruise control does not require the driver to touch the accelerator or brake pedal during vehicle operation; adaptive cruise control assists the driver in driving and reduces fatigue. Adaptive cruise control technology is based on active safety configurations and requires radar, ultrasonic, and infrared sensors to detect obstacles, pedestrians, and vehicles ahead. It must have automatic braking functionality to ensure precise distance control.
The biggest difference between full-speed adaptive cruise control and adaptive cruise control lies in their operational range. Adaptive cruise control can only automatically follow the vehicle ahead at higher speeds. If the speed drops very low, such as below 30 kilometers per hour, it will cancel or require manual intervention. However, full-speed adaptive cruise control is much more capable, operating from 0 speed up to the set maximum speed. Especially in traffic jams, even if the car comes to a complete stop, it can restart and follow the vehicle ahead, reducing the driver's workload. I've used adaptive cruise control on highways, and it's quite convenient for adjusting speed and maintaining distance. But once in the city, when speeds drop, it stops working, forcing me to always be ready to brake. The full-speed version is completely different. I tried it during weekend traffic jams while picking up my kids—completely taking my foot off, the car stopped and started on its own, which was incredibly effortless. Overall, full-speed adaptive cruise control is more like a complete partner, covering more scenarios.
