
Here are the specific differences between Audi RS and S: 1. Different models: S, as the name suggests, stands for SPORT, representing the performance version series of the Audi family, positioned just below RS and R. 2. Different performance: The RS series is equipped with a high-performance engine independently developed by quattro, delivering extraordinary performance and truly serving as the flagship model; while the S series is more ordinary. 3. Different prices: Compared to the S, the RS offers stronger power, richer configurations, better handling, and of course, a higher price. Naturally, the S model is also much more expensive than regular models.

The difference between Audi RS and S models primarily lies in performance level and daily usability. The RS series is Audi's flagship high-performance line, such as the RS6 or RS7, equipped with twin-turbo engines producing over 600 horsepower, accelerating in under 4 seconds, with track-tuned stiff suspensions and fuel consumption exceeding 20L/100km. These cars deliver intense acceleration but lower comfort. The S series, like the S5, is a sport-enhanced version with around 400 horsepower and moderately tuned suspensions, making it more suitable for urban driving with fuel consumption around 12L/100km. RS models have greater tuning potential but come with higher costs and insurance premiums, while S models are more practical, easier to maintain, and more affordable. Choose RS for extreme performance or S for a balanced daily driver—it all depends on personal needs and budget.

In terms of exterior and design, the Audi RS and S models differ significantly. RS models feature wide-body styling with large-sized alloy wheels, roaring quad exhaust systems, abundant carbon fiber details, and an overall aggressive, low-slung stance that turns heads on the road. The S versions have smoother, more understated lines, with subtle touches like black grilles and small spoilers, offering a more low-key daily driver appeal. Components such as braking systems are more robust in RS models, making them suitable for aggressive driving, while S versions have less weight reduction and limited modification potential. For daily use, the S models are less obtrusive and easier to park, whereas the RS is better suited for weekend joyrides or car meets, though maintenance tends to be more frequent and costly. Overall, the RS leans toward boldness, while the S embodies refined sportiness.

I've driven the Audi S series myself and test-driven the RS models, and the differences are quite noticeable. The S5 is great for daily commuting, with quick acceleration and no sluggishness, averaging around 12L in fuel consumption, and it handles bumps without much discomfort. The RS, like the RS5, has a launch so aggressive it can make you dizzy, with fuel consumption over 15L, and a hardcore road feel that makes it too noisy for city driving. For long-term use, the S is more worry-free and cost-effective, with lower insurance and less tire wear; the RS requires more frequent maintenance and has harder-to-find parts. For family scenarios, the S is sufficient, while the RS offers more fun but requires more consideration for practicality. If upgrading, the RS has greater potential but at double the cost, making it more suitable for pure enthusiasts.

Looking at price and target audience, Audi RS and S cater to different groups. The S series starts at $60,000, offering sporty tuning with increased horsepower that's exciting but not extreme, ideal for performance enthusiasts on a budget. RS models double in price, like the RS7 exceeding $100K, targeting elite players with ultimate performance but higher maintenance costs. In the used market, S models hold value steadily, while RS cars are rarer but depreciate slightly faster. For practicality, S balances comfort for daily commutes, whereas RS is track-focused with louder noise and higher fuel consumption. Average buyers choose S for an upgraded experience, while hardcore enthusiasts pursue RS for pushing limits—though modifications come at a significantly higher cost.


