
The differences between sidewalks and non-motorized vehicle lanes are as follows: 1. Different division ranges: Sidewalks refer to the parts of the road separated by curbs, guardrails, or other similar facilities, exclusively for pedestrians. Non-motorized vehicle lanes are the lanes on highways or urban roads, from the right curb (line) of the sidewalk to the first vehicle lane dividing line (or isolation belt, pier), or lanes marked on the sidewalk. 2. Different width settings: The width of a sidewalk equals the width of a pedestrian belt multiplied by the number of belts. In China, the width of each pedestrian belt is generally 0.75 to 1.00 meters, so the general width is four meters. The width of non-motorized vehicle lanes is generally determined based on the type and driving requirements of non-motorized vehicles, possible lateral combinations of various vehicles, and considering adverse situations such as parallel driving and overtaking. Different width combinations will occur when various non-motorized vehicles are mixed, and the lateral safety distance between two different types of non-motorized vehicles is about 0.4 to 0.5 meters, generally six meters. 3. Different division facilities: Sidewalks can be simply divided into five parts by function: curb, ancillary facility function belt, blind track, sidewalk, and setback line. Non-motorized vehicle lanes are just a lane without other functional settings.

I usually enjoy walking in the city, and the sidewalk feels the safest as it's specifically designed for pedestrians. The surface is smooth, the width is appropriate, and you don't have to worry about being disturbed by vehicles. The bike lane is different—it's for bicycles or electric scooters. The surface is smoother, may have slopes for easier riding, and you can often see bicycle symbols marked on it. Once, I saw an elderly man riding his bike on the sidewalk and almost hit a child—it was really close. These distinctions are quite important. Sidewalks are usually by the roadside near shops, making it convenient for pedestrians to stroll, while bike lanes connect to main roads, allowing cyclists to move smoothly. For everyone's safety, let's not mix them up. Pedestrians should stick to sidewalks, and cyclists should use bike lanes—each keeping to their own path to reduce accidents.

I've been commuting by bicycle for several years and deeply understand the crucial role of dedicated bicycle lanes. These are sections specifically designed for cycling, wider in size with smooth surfaces, making riding both effortless and safe. Sidewalks, on the other hand, are exclusively for pedestrians, featuring finer paving materials and sometimes tactile paving to assist the visually impaired, providing a more comfortable walking experience. The design differences between the two are evident: sidewalks are narrower and positioned closer to the edges, while bicycle lanes directly connect to the transportation network. When cycling, encountering unauthorized use of sidewalks can lead to skidding or collisions, which is neither safe nor considerate. I recommend that cyclists use designated lanes and pedestrians stay off them to minimize collision risks. In urban areas where bicycle lanes are sometimes absent, it's important to plan alternative routes carefully—safety should always come first, don't rush.

In my daily activities, I always notice the design differences between sidewalks and non-motorized vehicle lanes. Sidewalks are for pedestrians, paved with bricks or stone slabs, which are more refined and conducive to walking, usually with protection along the street. Non-motorized vehicle lanes are for bicycles, with harder surfaces suitable for wheels, positioned closer to the center of the road. These distinctions are crucial—if mixed, pedestrians can easily be startled by vehicles, and cyclists may feel uncomfortable due to bumps. Clearly demarcating these in urban areas can prevent accidents, and planning should consider separating pedestrians and vehicles to enhance safety.


