What is the difference between 320 and 325?
4 Answers
320 and 325 have significant differences in power. Below is a detailed introduction to their differences: 1. Power: The 320i has 156 horsepower, 250N·m of torque, and a 0-100km/h acceleration time of 9 seconds. The 325i has 186 horsepower, 300N·m of torque, and a 0-100km/h acceleration time of 7.3 seconds. The 330i has 258 horsepower, 400N·m of torque, and a 0-100km/h acceleration time of 6.2 seconds. 2. Configuration: Compared to the 325i, the 320i lacks an M sport steering wheel, Sensatec synthetic leather dashboard, and intelligent ambient lighting (including welcome light carpet).
Hey buddy, when it comes to the difference between the BMW 320 and 325, I've worked on plenty of these cars as a mechanic. From my experience, the biggest distinction lies in the engine tuning - the 320 typically comes with a 2.0-liter turbocharged engine, producing around 180 to 200 horsepower, making it ideal for daily commuting with better fuel efficiency, averaging about 8 liters per 100km. The 325, on the other hand, features an upgraded tuning program that boosts horsepower to over 230, delivering quicker acceleration with a 0-100km/h time about half a second faster. However, the high-performance engine in the 325 is slightly more expensive and requires more meticulous maintenance. You need to watch out for potential sensor failures or turbo wear issues since it's tuned more aggressively. For everyday driving, the 320 is more economical and stable. If it's just for commuting or grocery runs, I'd genuinely recommend it - the fuel savings can be used elsewhere. Having repaired many units, I've noticed that the 325 tends to develop carbon buildup more easily if driven hard, so regular cleaning is essential.
As an average consumer, I struggled between choosing the 320 or 325 when buying a car, mainly due to differences in power and fuel efficiency. The 320 model comes with a lower-powered 2.0T engine, offering smooth and economical performance, with urban fuel consumption around 7.5 liters per 100 kilometers. A full tank can take you quite far, making it ideal for small families like mine—taking kids to school and weekend shopping—absolutely sufficient if you're not into racing. The 325, on the other hand, packs significantly more horsepower, delivering noticeable acceleration and a push-back sensation, but at the cost of higher fuel consumption, around 9 liters in urban driving. It's also several thousand dollars more expensive, with higher maintenance costs. I chose the 320 for its affordability and ease of upkeep, as it handles city commuting effortlessly. The 325 is better suited for younger drivers who frequently hit the highway or enjoy sporty driving. Overall, from a practical standpoint, the 320 is worry-free and wallet-friendly, with minimal configuration differences—just a slight upgrade in engine output.
To me, the difference between the BMW 320 and 325 boils down to engine performance—the 320's 2.0T engine is the entry-level version, delivering just over 180 horsepower, offering a smooth and steady drive; the 325, however, has higher turbocharging parameters, pushing horsepower to over 230, making overtaking during acceleration much easier, and that exhilarating kick-back feeling is simply thrilling! As a car enthusiast, I've test-driven both multiple times, and the 325 feels more agile in cornering with its sportier-tuned chassis. The design remains largely unchanged, but in terms of fuel consumption, the 325 can be about 10% higher in city driving, making it more suitable for those who crave driving excitement. In the long run, the horsepower upgrade makes the 325 better suited for mountain roads or track experiences.
