What is the difference between 1.2L and 1.5L engine displacement?

[ORiver]

Here are the main differences between 1.2L and 1.5L engine displacement: 1. Turbocharging vs. naturally aspirated: Naturally aspirated engines offer higher stability and smoother power output; turbocharging can significantly improve fuel economy, reduce exhaust emissions, and maintain relatively low fuel consumption compared to naturally aspirated engines with similar power, but they have higher maintenance costs in the long run. 2. How to choose between 1.2L and 1.5L: If the consumer primarily drives in the city or for short distances at low speeds, the 1.2L engine is recommended. For highway driving or long-distance travel, the 1.5L engine is advised. This is because at high speeds, smaller displacement engines require more throttle input, while in city driving, larger displacement engines are less fuel-efficient than smaller ones.

[PeterAnn]

I've been driving for over 20 years and can clearly feel the difference between 1.2L and 1.5L engines. In city driving, 1.2L cars are much more fuel-efficient, saving dozens of yuan per 100 kilometers, and they're easier to handle in traffic jams. But on highways or mountain roads, the 1.5L engine shows its advantages with stronger horsepower for faster climbing and more stable driving. Having driven several cars with different displacements, I've noticed that 1.2L models have lower maintenance costs and slower tire wear, while 1.5L engines, though consuming slightly more fuel, provide better power for handling heavy loads or air conditioning demands. With turbocharging technology becoming popular nowadays, the comparison between 1.2T and 1.5T engines is also worth discussing - small displacement paired with turbo often balances power and fuel efficiency. Overall, choosing engine displacement depends on driving needs - 1.2L is better for short commutes, while 1.5L offers more confidence for frequent long-distance driving.

[MacGideon]

I usually focus on fuel consumption and environmental protection, so I've studied the differences between 1.2L and 1.5L engines. The 1.2L engine typically has lower fuel consumption, around 5-6 liters per 100 kilometers, with less CO2 emissions, making it more environmentally friendly. The 1.5L engine offers stronger power but consumes about 15% more fuel and emits more. For urban commuting, the 1.2L is very economical and practical, saving significant fuel costs and reducing emissions over time. However, on highways, the 1.5L shows clear advantages with faster acceleration and a stronger sense of safety. With the rise of electric vehicles, smaller displacement engines are becoming more popular. For those who frequently travel long distances, choosing a 1.5L can avoid overloading a smaller engine. I keep a fuel consumption log when driving. When choosing between 1.2L and 1.5L, it's best to first assess your route frequency—office workers may prefer the 1.2L, while frequent travelers might find the 1.5L more cost-effective.

[OMarcus]

As a car enthusiast, I prefer 1.5L engines over 1.2L. The 1.5L delivers more horsepower, faster acceleration, stronger back-push feeling, and more precise handling; while the 1.2L feels sluggish and slow, especially when overtaking on highways. My experience shows that engine displacement directly impacts driving pleasure: 1.5L engines are easier to modify and upgrade, responding quickly on tracks or mountain roads; 1.2L engines have limited modification potential and tend to underperform. The difference becomes more noticeable with AC on or when carrying passengers - the 1.5L remains stable while the 1.2L might struggle. Overall, driving enthusiasts should opt for larger displacements, while smaller engines suffice for daily commuting.