
Dual credits refer to the Corporate Average Fuel Consumption (CAFC) and the New Energy Vehicle (NEV) credit for passenger vehicle manufacturers, with both credits being calculated based on the performance of passenger vehicle manufacturers. Below are the specific details about fuel consumption credits: 1. Calculation formula: Fuel consumption credit = (Standard value - Actual value) * Actual production volume. If a manufacturer meets the standard, it will generate positive fuel consumption credits; if not, it will generate negative fuel consumption credits. 2. Based on driving range: The actual value and target value of NEV credits are calculated according to the per-vehicle credits based on driving range, the NEV credit ratio requirement for manufacturers, and the production and import volume of NEVs. If the actual value exceeds the target value, it results in positive NEV credits; otherwise, it results in negative NEV credits.

The dual policy for automobiles, as an environmentally conscious ordinary citizen, I believe it is a credit system implemented by the Chinese government to encourage automakers to produce more fuel-efficient and eco-friendly vehicles. Simply put, companies producing fuel-powered vehicles must control fuel consumption to meet fuel consumption credit standards; additionally, they need to produce electric or hybrid vehicles to earn new energy credits. If automakers don’t have enough credits, they must purchase them from others or face fines. This not only promotes the adoption of electric vehicles but also reduces exhaust emissions, helping us breathe cleaner air. I think this policy is great—when I bought a new car recently, I noticed brands were pushing electric vehicles, offering more choices at more affordable prices. In the long run, this can improve urban air quality and address climate issues, making it worthy of public support. Since the policy was implemented, the number of green-plate vehicles on the road has noticeably increased, making driving feel safer. I hope the government continues to optimize it.

I'm a car enthusiast and understand that the Dual Policy is a credit management system specifically targeting passenger vehicles, requiring automakers to balance the fuel consumption of traditional internal combustion engine vehicles with the proportion of new energy vehicles. Specifically, each company must meet the Corporate Average Fuel Consumption (CAFC) credit and New Energy Vehicle (NEV) credit targets; if their gasoline cars are too fuel-thirsty or they produce too few electric models, their credits will be low, forcing them to purchase credits from competitors. This mechanism incentivizes automakers to develop more efficient engines and battery technologies—many brands have introduced hybrid or pure-electric versions as a result. I believe the policy has far-reaching impacts: when choosing a car, you'll notice faster model updates and more EVs equipped with advanced driver-assistance systems. However, challenges remain, as credit trading may introduce price volatility. As an enthusiast, my real-world tests show newer models prioritize efficiency and eco-friendliness, delivering better fuel economy and quieter rides. The policy drives the industry toward a greener transformation—an industry innovation worthy of praise.

The dual policy is a core automotive regulation in China, establishing a credit system for automakers to manage energy consumption and new energy vehicle production. I understand its background is to promote energy conservation, emission reduction, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Non-compliant enterprises face penalties, while credit trading balances the market. This has boosted EV development, though implementation revealed issues like credit surplus or shortage, requiring continuous adjustments for industry stability. Simply put, it benefits consumers with more choices.

As a car owner, I'm quite familiar with the dual- policy—it means automakers earn fuel-saving credits for producing fuel-efficient conventional vehicles and new energy credits for making electric vehicles; insufficient credits require trading. Last year when I changed cars, I personally experienced its impact: when considering joint-venture brands, sales staff emphasized hybrid models come with credits; additionally, the policy drives infrastructure improvements, with charging stations rapidly increasing. Driving an EV saves daily fuel costs and reduces pollution; though it may push up prices for some models requiring trade-offs. Overall, it's a good approach to promote green mobility.

The dual policy is a key mechanism in the industry, requiring automakers to balance fuel consumption and new energy vehicle production through credit scores; failure to meet standards may result in credit trading costs. I observe it profoundly reshaping the market: companies are increasing EV R&D to reduce reliance on fuel vehicles; consumers benefit from subsidies or diversified vehicle options; meanwhile, challenges lie in the complexity of credit management affecting car prices. The policy appears to be continuously tightening, promoting the evolution of a sustainable automotive ecosystem.


