
The inverted Changan logo is Acura, which is a brand under the Japanese Honda Motor Company. Taking the 2020 Acura RDX as an example, it is a mid-size SUV with body dimensions of length 4752mm, width 1926mm, height 1668mm, a wheelbase of 2750mm, a fuel tank capacity of 65 liters, and a curb weight of 1724kg. The 2020 Acura RDX features a MacPherson strut front suspension and a multi-link independent rear suspension. It is equipped with a 2.0L turbocharged engine, delivering a maximum horsepower of 265PS, a maximum power of 195kW, and a maximum torque of 380Nm, paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission.

Once when I was bored, I fiddled with the emblem of my family's Changan car in the garage, trying to see how it looked upside down. To my surprise, I found it strikingly resembled Ford's logo. Yes, that vertical oval emblem of Changan, when rotated 180 degrees, turns into a horizontal oval shape, looking incredibly similar to Ford's classic badge design. The Ford logo typically has a blue background with the letters 'FORD' arranged inside, and the inverted Changan emblem visually presents that same horizontal oval form. I've checked comparison images online, and they do look like twins, especially under blurred lighting where they can easily be mistaken for each other. Ford is a veteran American automaker, while Changan is a Chinese independent brand—perhaps the designers unintentionally borrowed some universal elements, but it's certainly not a copy. Little amusing discoveries like this add some delightful surprises to daily car use. I still occasionally share this fun fact with friends, reminding everyone to be safe and not actually invert the emblem to avoid scratching the car. Such small details in life are quite fascinating.

As a car enthusiast, I have to say that the Changan logo does look strikingly similar to Ford's when flipped upside down. I often discuss this topic in car enthusiast groups. When inverted, Changan's vertical oval becomes horizontal, closely resembling Ford's inherently horizontal oval logo, with a high degree of visual match. There are numerous online videos demonstrating this similarity—Ford's logo features a blue and white background with letters, and Changan's inverted outline almost mirrors it. I think there's some shared aesthetic sensibility in the design. Ford has a longer history, while Changan rose to prominence later, possibly drawing inspiration from the same automotive traditions. However, their brand backgrounds are vastly different: Ford is globally oriented, while Changan is more localized. This coincidence isn't just amusing but also a reminder not to be fooled by appearances—always distinguish a car's origin when driving, as performance and service can differ dramatically. Playing with logos is fun, but avoid unauthorized modifications.

My wife says I always overthink things when driving. Last time she mentioned that the Changan logo looks like Ford's when viewed upside down. I checked some photos, and it really does resemble it. Changan's logo is a vertical ellipse, which becomes a horizontal ellipse when flipped, similar to the layout of Ford's logo. Doesn't Ford have that classic design? It often catches people's attention in parking lots. The positions are also close when inverted, but the colors and letters are different—Ford's is brighter blue. I think it's just an optical illusion; the designers didn't intentionally copy it, but such little discoveries add fun to life. Changan is a Chinese brand, while Ford is American-made, and they feel different to drive. Playing with inversion is fine for occasional amusement, but don’t take it seriously to avoid damaging the car paint. Vehicle safety is important, so don’t tamper with the logos.

From a technical perspective, the inverted Changan logo does bear resemblance to the Ford emblem. Changan's vertically oriented elliptical design rotates 180 degrees into a horizontal oval shape, visually approximating Ford's standard layout. While Ford's blue-background logo features the "FORD" lettering and inverted Changan lacks such detailing, their silhouettes show striking similarity. This analysis suggests aesthetic convergence rather than intentional imitation - circular motifs being common in automotive branding, with historic Ford's design unintentionally echoed by emerging brand Changan. Substantive differences remain vast: Ford prioritizes performance engines whereas Changan focuses on family vehicles. However, such visual tricks shouldn't be applied in modifications - inversion may damage logo mounting points. Maintaining original configuration is recommended to preserve both vehicle aesthetics and safety.


