
Pros and cons of automatic emergency braking systems: 1. Advantages: Significantly improves driving safety by using radar waves to detect blind spots around the vehicle and alerting the driver through audio signals or other methods. It demonstrates particularly high practicality in urban traffic congestion and at traffic light intersections. 2. Disadvantages: Issues include sudden braking, low success rate of braking, various quality problems with braking response levels. It's unrealistic to expect such systems to completely prevent accidents - their true value lies in reducing the severity of potential collisions.

I've been driving for twenty years, and the autonomous emergency braking system does indeed improve safety. It has helped me avoid rear-end collisions several times when I got distracted in traffic jams, saving me from troublesome accidents. However, on the other hand, it carries the risk of false alarms. For example, in heavy fog or rainstorms, the sensors may mistake raindrops or branches for obstacles, triggering sudden automatic braking, which startles everyone in the car. Moreover, frequent recalibration of the system is required, and the maintenance costs aren’t cheap. Overall, it’s a good assistant, but it shouldn’t be entirely relied upon. Drivers must stay focused and not become too relaxed, as technology isn’t infallible—safe driving ultimately depends on oneself. This is especially important during long trips, where frequent false triggers can actually increase fatigue.

I'm fascinated by automotive technology. The automatic emergency braking system detects vehicles ahead in real-time using radar and cameras, and automatically applies the brakes when a collision is predicted, significantly reducing traffic accident rates, especially helpful on highways. However, its drawback is its reliance on electronic components, which can sometimes fail in extreme weather or strong light, causing delayed responses or non-operation. Additionally, the cost of upgrades and maintenance is quite high, requiring extra expenses for each system update, which is a burden for owners seeking technological convenience. I believe this technology is progressing, but don't rely on it entirely; it's still necessary to regularly check the system's status.

Having focused on traffic safety for years, I've found that autonomous emergency braking systems can effectively reduce accident rates, with studies showing they prevent up to 30% of rear-end collisions, safeguarding countless passengers. However, their drawback lies in potential false alarms, particularly in heavy traffic where frequent automatic deceleration disrupts driving habits and causes frustration. System maintenance is also crucial—dirty or aging sensors require timely cleaning or replacement, otherwise effectiveness diminishes significantly. It's recommended that owners perform regular maintenance to maximize benefits.

When buying a car, I always consider the cost-performance ratio. The advantage of an automatic emergency braking system is that it can prevent accidental collisions, saving on repair and insurance costs, making it cost-effective in the long run, especially when driving in the city, as it reduces driving stress. The downside is the high installation cost, adding several thousand dollars to the purchase price as an optional feature. The system occasionally misjudges situations, leading to unnecessary braking, causing discomfort and bumps, and requiring additional repair costs. For someone on a tight budget like me, while this feature is nice, it's essential to weigh actual needs against financial constraints.


