What Are the Drawbacks of Small-Displacement Turbocharging?
2 Answers
Turbocharging offers the advantage of delivering more powerful performance, allowing for substantial torque and power output even with small engine displacements. However, it also comes with certain drawbacks. Turbochargers operate under higher workloads and temperatures, resulting in a shorter lifespan compared to naturally aspirated engines. Additionally, small-displacement turbocharged engines tend to exhibit slower acceleration from a standstill, as the turbocharger requires reaching a certain RPM to engage. Below is a more detailed introduction: 1. Turbocharging Technology: Turbocharging (Turbo-Boost) is a technology that utilizes exhaust gases produced by an internal combustion engine (Internal-Combustion-Engine) to drive an air compressor (Air-compressor). The primary function of turbocharging is to increase the engine's air intake, thereby enhancing its power and torque output, making the vehicle more dynamic. The most significant advantage of turbocharging lies in its ability to deliver stronger performance, which manifests in two ways: First, even with a small displacement, it can achieve high torque and power. Second, it provides a stable high torque output. For instance, modern 1.5T engines can consistently deliver a maximum torque of over 240 N·m within an RPM range of 1,700 to 5,000. 2. Relative Disadvantages of Turbocharged Engines: In the same vehicle model, the turbocharged variant is typically more expensive to purchase, and its maintenance costs are also higher. From a theoretical perspective, turbocharged engines, due to their higher operational intensity and temperatures, as well as more complex components, tend to have a shorter lifespan than naturally aspirated engines. Moreover, their maintenance requirements are more stringent. Under the same displacement conditions, turbocharged engines consume more fuel than naturally aspirated engines. This is because turbocharging essentially draws in more air, which correspondingly requires more fuel consumption to achieve the higher power output. Consequently, turbocharged engines exhibit higher fuel consumption compared to their naturally aspirated counterparts of the same displacement.
I remember driving a small-displacement turbocharged car, and the most frustrating thing was the lag when accelerating. You step on the gas, and it hesitates for a few seconds before the turbo kicks in and delivers power—this is especially annoying in city traffic or when going uphill. Then there's the fuel consumption. They advertise it as fuel-efficient, but once you hit the highway or climb a slope with a full load, the engine revs up, and the fuel consumption spikes. In the end, it doesn’t save much compared to a larger-displacement engine. Maintenance is expensive too—my car’s turbocharger failed once, and the repair cost several thousand yuan. Plus, you always worry about overheating damaging parts. In comparison, older naturally aspirated engines are smoother and more reliable. Overall, the fuel-saving advantage is overshadowed by these drawbacks. I’d recommend avoiding this setup for everyday family cars unless you mostly drive short distances on flat roads.
