What are the differences between Wuling Hongguang S and V?
3 Answers
The differences between Wuling Hongguang S and V are: 1. Different positioning: Wuling Hongguang S is a mid-size SUV; Wuling Hongguang V is a microvan. 2. Different dimensions: The exterior dimensions of Wuling Hongguang S are 4655mm in length, 1735mm in width, and 1790mm in height, with a wheelbase of 2800mm; the exterior dimensions of Wuling Hongguang V are 4425mm in length, 1670mm in width, and 1860mm in height, with a wheelbase of 2850mm. 3. Different powertrains: Wuling Hongguang S is equipped with 1.5L and 1.5T engines, paired with a 6-speed manual transmission; Wuling Hongguang V is equipped with a 1.5L engine, paired with a 5-speed manual transmission.
I've been using the Hongguang S to shuttle my kids to school. It's more like a family-oriented MPV with a comfortable 7-seat layout. The rear space is spacious, making it easy to carry children and luggage, and the fuel consumption is also quite low. In comparison, the Hongguang V is clearly more commercial-oriented, with a stiffer chassis tuning. The rear seats can be folded into a large flat surface, which is super convenient for loading cargo, but sitting for long periods can cause backaches. For city driving, the S is more agile with lighter steering, while the V feels a bit cumbersome when fully loaded, though it's fine when empty. If it's just for family use, I'd definitely recommend the S. But if you need to haul a lot of cargo, the V is more practical. It all depends on personal needs—test driving both before buying is the best way to understand the differences.
I often use the Hongguang V for deliveries, and what I like most about it is its spacious rear cargo area, which can fit a lot of boxes, and the loading and unloading are convenient with its wide-opening doors. The Hongguang S is different; the rear seats are fixed for passengers, making it too restrictive for hauling goods—only small items can be placed at most. In terms of performance, both have similar engines, with sufficient 1.5L power, but the V's suspension design is more durable, making it less worrisome to drive on bumpy roads. The S, on the other hand, prioritizes comfort with softer suspension, making long drives less tiring. I've tried taking my family out in the S, and the noise insulation is really impressive, while the V has more wind noise. The V offers better value for money, being a few thousand dollars cheaper. If I were only doing transportation, I'd definitely choose the V, but if I wanted to balance family use, I'd have to weigh my options.
