What are the differences between v97 and v93?

[TimothyRose]

v97 and v93 have the following differences: 1. Different displacement: The Pajero v93 has a 3.0L displacement, while the Pajero v97 has a 3.8L displacement. 2. Different power: The Pajero V93 is equipped with a V6-24 valve-SOHC engine, with a maximum power of 129kw and a maximum torque of 259N·m, featuring advanced part-time four-wheel drive technology and a five-speed manual transmission. The Pajero V97 is equipped with a Mitsubishi 6G75 gasoline engine, which adopts multi-point fuel injection technology, with a maximum horsepower of 250 horsepower and a peak torque of 330N·m.

[LailaLee]

I've driven both the Mitsubishi Pajero V97 and V93, and the engine differences are the most noticeable. The V97 comes with a 3.8L V6 engine, delivering around 250 horsepower and substantial torque, offering rapid acceleration and exceptional performance during hill climbs or off-road adventures, making it a thrilling drive. On the other hand, the V93 is equipped with a 3.0L V6 engine, producing about 180 horsepower, which is adequate for daily use but lacks the same level of explosive power. I've tested both in sandy off-road conditions—the V97 easily handles tough situations, while the V93 requires more skill. In terms of fuel consumption, the V97 easily exceeds 15L/100km in city driving, whereas the V93 averages around 12L/100km, making it significantly more fuel-efficient. Maintenance-wise, both models are durable, but the V97's larger displacement means slightly higher upkeep costs. If you prioritize power and off-road capability, the V97 is the better choice, especially suited for adventurous drivers.

[DakotaLee]

As a family user, I prioritize practicality and fuel efficiency. The V93's 3.0L engine delivers good fuel economy, with city driving consuming 12-13L per 100km and highway driving dropping to 10L, saving hundreds on monthly fuel costs. The V97 has a 3.8L displacement, higher fuel consumption exceeding 15L in the city, making it less suitable for daily commutes. I drive the V93 for my 50km daily commute—it offers smooth and adequate power, low noise, and is both economical and eco-friendly. The V97 has stronger power but wastes fuel unless frequently used for long-distance trips or heavy towing. Price-wise, the V93 is typically tens of thousands cheaper, offering higher value for money. When choosing, I prioritized the V93 as it better aligns with practical daily needs.

[CharlesAnn]

Having been into off-roading for years, I've experienced the differences between the V97 and V93. The V97's engine delivers greater torque, offering superior escape capability in off-road situations—whether climbing steep slopes or navigating muddy terrain, it's less prone to getting stuck. The V93, with slightly weaker power, demands more driving skill. Both share similar four-wheel-drive systems and chassis, but the V97 excels in low-speed performance. Driving the V97 through deserts, the power feels endless; the V93 struggles a bit under the same conditions. In terms of fuel consumption, the V97 is thirstier, requiring ample fuel reserves for long trips. Both are reliable in maintenance, though the V97's larger displacement means slightly faster wear over time. Hardcore off-road enthusiasts should opt for the V97, while the V93 suffices for casual players.