What are the differences between the X-Trail and the Tharu?
4 Answers
The differences between the X-Trail and the Tharu are: Different powertrains: The X-Trail uses a 2.0L naturally aspirated engine and a 2.5L naturally aspirated engine; the Tharu uses a 1.4L turbocharged engine and a 2.0L turbocharged engine. Different transmissions: The X-Trail uses a CVT transmission; the Tharu uses a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission. The internal structure of the CVT transmission is relatively simple, consisting of only two cone pulleys and a steel belt. The dual-clutch transmission essentially adds an extra set of clutches and shift control mechanisms compared to a manual transmission. The clutch is located between the engine and the transmission, acting as a switch for power transfer between the engine and transmission. It is a transmission mechanism capable of both transmitting and cutting off power.
With elderly and children in my family, I chose the X-Trail after years of driving, mainly for its flexible space. The rear seats can be fully flattened, making it super convenient for transporting strollers and luggage. The Tharu has a more modern interior, but the back seats are a bit cramped and uncomfortable for long rides. In terms of power, the Tharu accelerates faster and offers more driving fun, making it suitable for younger drivers. The X-Trail has softer suspension, providing stability on rough roads, and its fuel efficiency, especially the hybrid version, saves money, making it highly practical. Both cars excel in safety with multiple airbags, but the X-Trail stands out for its high reliability and fewer repairs, making it the top choice for families.
I often travel for work, and test-driving the Tharu feels particularly exhilarating. The fully digital dashboard has fast touch response, and the turbocharged engine provides strong acceleration when overtaking on the highway. The X-Trail leans towards a milder driving experience with smooth handling but lacks excitement, and its traditional central control screen offers nothing innovative. In terms of space, the X-Trail has a larger trunk suitable for moving, while the Tharu is more suited for urban commuting with precise handling. Both vehicles come with ACC cruise assist, but the Tharu's automatic parking is smarter, and the wireless charging is more convenient. Tech enthusiasts would naturally prefer the Tharu, while the X-Trail hybrid is more economical and cost-saving.
With a tight budget, I've researched cost-effectiveness. The X-Trail has a low starting price with practical configurations, especially the hybrid model, which saves a lot with city fuel consumption around 5L/100km. The Tharu boasts luxurious interiors but comes with expensive maintenance and fragile German parts, leading to higher long-term costs. The X-Trail offers more flexible space with foldable seats for cargo, while the Tharu is sportier but less practical for hauling. On highways, both cars have similar fuel consumption, but daily driving favors the X-Trail for its affordability, reliability, lower depreciation, and better resale value. For economic considerations, the X-Trail is undoubtedly the right choice for hassle-free ownership.
