What are the differences between the third and fourth generations of dq200?
2 Answers
The main differences between the third and fourth generations are as follows: 1. Steel Cannon: The third generation is a small steel cannon, while the fourth generation is a large steel cannon. 2. Lens Hood: The third generation has a circular lens hood, while the fourth generation has a petal-shaped lens hood with wrinkle paint. 3. D-Type: The third generation only has AF D-Type lenses (with aperture rings) and no S, while the fourth generation has AF-S D-Type lenses. 4. Focusing: The third generation can only autofocus with cameras that have a built-in motor, while the fourth generation can autofocus with all cameras. More relevant information is as follows: 1. Introduction: Nikon is a famous Japanese camera manufacturer established in 1917, originally named Nippon Kogaku K.K. In 1988, the company was renamed Nikon Corporation based on its camera brand. 2. Features: The name "Nikon" has been used since 1946 and is a Romanized abbreviation of the Japanese pronunciation of "Nippon Kogaku," combined with the German spelling "kon" from Zeiss Ikon cameras. Among Nikon's numerous camera products, the most notable include Nikkor camera lenses, Nikonos underwater cameras, Nikon F-series 135 film SLR cameras, and Nikon D-series digital SLR cameras, as well as the Coolpix series of consumer digital cameras. Nikon is also a manufacturer of step-and-repeat semiconductor production equipment (steppers). The company also produces goggles, ophthalmic examination equipment, binoculars, microscopes, and surveying instruments.
Let me share the differences between the 3rd and 4th generation DQ200 from an owner's perspective. My own car is equipped with the 3rd-gen DQ200, and after driving it for several years, I've noticed some minor issues, like occasional jerking at low speeds, especially in traffic jams, which can be quite uncomfortable. Later, I tried a friend's car with the 4th-gen version, and it was noticeably smoother, with faster gear shifts and more responsive acceleration. According to research, the 4th generation improved the hydraulic system, reducing failure rates, and optimized the control software for more stable driving overall. There's also a slight improvement in fuel efficiency—my older model averages around 7L/100km, while the newer one can go down to about 6.5L/100km, making daily commutes more economical. If considering a transmission upgrade, I'd recommend the 4th generation, as it addresses many of the 3rd-gen's lingering issues, improving reliability and making it much more hassle-free to use. Maintenance costs aren't high either, so I suggest test-driving both to compare the actual performance.
