What are the differences between the Teana 2.3 and 3.5?
3 Answers
Teana 2.3 and 3.5 differ in model and speed. New changes in exterior design: The front face of the Teana features a V-shaped smoked black grille design, paired with chrome trim decorations, giving it a sharp and three-dimensional look. The side profile boasts low and smooth lines, complemented by a fastback design, highlighting the elongated and dynamic body. The rear incorporates many straight lines, exuding a sporty feel and enhancing the vehicle's layered appearance. New features in configuration: In terms of configuration, whether it's the 2.0L or 2.0T models, all come standard with features like tire pressure monitoring, hill start assist, keyless start, a multimedia large screen, and Bluetooth calling. As the model configuration upgrades, additional features such as steering wheel heating, BOSE audio, and a comprehensive driving assistance system will be progressively included.
I remember test driving the Teana 2.3 and 3.5, and I was truly amazed by the power difference. The 3.5's power is incredibly fierce—step on the gas, and it leaps forward, overtaking without breaking a sweat, feeling as stable as a sports car on the highway. In contrast, the 2.3 is adequate for daily driving but accelerates more gently, making it ideal for stop-and-go city traffic without any rush. In terms of fuel consumption, the 3.5 guzzles gas quickly, with a full tank not lasting long, so you’ll need to plan fuel stops for long trips. The 2.3 is more economical, needing just one refill a week for commuting. The driving experience also differs significantly: the 3.5 has sharper steering but feels a bit floaty in corners, while the 2.3 is steadier and better suited for novice drivers. Price-wise, the 3.5 is tens of thousands more expensive, making it a choice for thrill-seekers, whereas the 2.3 is more budget-friendly. All things considered, I’d recommend the 2.3 for beginners or commuters and the 3.5 for friends who love speed.
I've used the Teana 2.3 as a family car for many years, and after comparing it with the 3.5 version, I found that daily fuel efficiency is its biggest advantage. The 2.3 consumes much less fuel, averaging around 9 liters per 100 kilometers, making city driving and refueling costs quite manageable. In contrast, the 3.5 easily exceeds 12 liters, especially when using air conditioning in summer, which adds up in expenses. Maintenance costs also differ noticeably—larger engines like the 3.5 require more expensive oil and filter changes, while my modest 2.3 only costs a few hundred yuan per month in upkeep. Comfort-wise, both cars are similar, with moderately firm seats that make family trips comfortable, though the 3.5 is noisier, and its roaring startup can scare kids. Insurance costs are higher for larger engines, so that's another factor to consider when purchasing. In short, if you're after affordability and practicality, skip the hassle and go for the 2.3—it's the right choice.
