What are the differences between the second and third generations of Honda hybrid?
2 Answers
Honda hybrid third generation and second generation main differences are as follows: 1. Engine aspect: CRV uses the second generation i-MMD. The difference between the third generation i-MMD and the second generation is mainly the replacement of a more thermally efficient Atkinson cycle engine, increasing from 39% (maximum thermal efficiency) of the LFA11 to 40.6% of the LFB11. 2. Production location: The second generation was imported, while the third generation is domestically produced. 3. Fuel tank aspect: The third generation has a slightly larger fuel tank than the second generation. 4. Driving experience: The third generation offers better driving refinement compared to the second generation.
As someone who frequently drives hybrid vehicles, I've noticed significant differences between the second and third generations of Honda hybrids, mainly in terms of technology and driving experience. The second generation, launched around 2014, used nickel-metal hydride batteries—reliable but somewhat heavy. The third generation, upgraded around 2017, switched to lithium-ion batteries, which are lighter and have higher energy density, directly reducing fuel consumption by about 10%. In daily driving, the third generation feels smoother during acceleration, especially in traffic jams, with more frequent electric mode engagement and fewer engine starts, making it much quieter. The motor control has also been optimized, offering faster response and easier steering handling. During test drives, I clearly felt the third generation is better suited for city commuting—fuel-efficient and hassle-free. Additionally, the weight reduction improves overall stability and slightly enhances safety. These changes make the third generation not only more eco-friendly but also more practical.
