What are the differences between the Mercedes-Benz GLC200 and GLC260?
3 Answers
Differences between the Mercedes-Benz GLC200 and GLC260: 1. Curb weight differs: The GLC200 has a curb weight of 1490 kg; the GLC260 has a curb weight of 1580 kg. 2. Fuel tank capacity varies: The GLC200 has a fuel tank capacity of 50 liters; the GLC260 has a fuel tank capacity of 56 liters. 3. Engine displacement is different: The GLC200 is equipped with a 1.6T turbocharged engine; the GLC260 is equipped with a 2.0T turbocharged engine. 4. Maximum torque differs: The GLC200 has a maximum torque of 250 Nm; the GLC260 has a maximum torque of 350 Nm.
I've driven the Mercedes-Benz GLC a few times. The main difference between the 200 and 260 lies in the power. The GLC 200 has a lower output of around 180 horsepower, providing a smooth start suitable for city commuting. It reacts a bit slower when overtaking but is more fuel-efficient, with an average fuel consumption of about 8L/100km. The 260, on the other hand, boosts the horsepower to around 240. A step on the accelerator gives a much stronger push-back feeling, making it easier to overtake on the highway, but it consumes more fuel, approximately 10L/100km. In terms of price, the entry-level 200 is about 50,000 to 60,000 yuan cheaper. The configurations are basically the same, with features like rearview camera and heated seats being standard. However, if you love driving fast, the 260 is more thrilling but requires a bigger budget. For daily use, the 200 is practical enough, and the maintenance costs are similar, around 2,000 yuan for an oil change.
As an average user, I noticed a significant price difference between the GLC 200 and 260. The 200 starts at just over 300,000 yuan, while the 260 costs tens of thousands more with higher specs but offers about 40 more horsepower. In daily driving, the 200 has gentler acceleration, slightly lower fuel consumption (saving about 1L per 100km in the city), and less tire wear, making maintenance cheaper. The 260 delivers stronger performance with higher fuel consumption and possibly higher insurance costs. There's no major difference in practicality—both have the same spacious interior and trunk capacity, sufficient for family luggage. The 200 suits budget-conscious families or commuters who occasionally drive on highways, though the 260 offers more comfort on long trips with noticeably quicker steering response.
