What are the differences between the Honda UR-V and CR-V?

[Quinn]

The differences between the Honda UR-V and CR-V lie in their fuel consumption: the Honda UR-V has a fuel consumption of 7.2 to 8.7 liters per 100 kilometers, while the Honda CR-V consumes 6.4 liters per 100 kilometers. Taking the 2021 Honda CR-V as an example, it is a compact SUV with body dimensions of 4621mm in length, 1855mm in width, 1679mm in height, and a wheelbase of 2661mm. The 2021 Honda CR-V features a MacPherson strut front suspension and a multi-link independent rear suspension. It is equipped with a 1.5T turbocharged engine, delivering a maximum horsepower of 193PS, a maximum torque of 243Nm, and a maximum power of 142kW.

[DiLena]

As a responsible family user, I find the differences between choosing the Honda UR-V and CR-V quite noticeable. The CR-V serves as our family’s daily commuter, with its well-designed space—the trunk easily accommodates a stroller, shopping bags, and luggage for the whole family. Its fuel consumption is impressively low, averaging 7-8 liters per 100 km, saving us a lot on gas. The UR-V, on the other hand, is a size larger, offering a backseat that feels like a small living room with ample legroom. However, its larger body makes parking a hassle, especially in crowded urban areas where extra caution is needed. In terms of safety, both models share similar features like automatic emergency braking and lane departure warning, but the UR-V adds some luxury touches such as a panoramic sunroof, which does enhance comfort. For an average family, though, the CR-V’s practicality and affordability are more tangible, with a more budget-friendly price tag. The UR-V is better suited for families who occasionally transport relatives or friends or have long-distance travel needs. But for daily use, I’ve found the CR-V’s flexibility and reliability to be the top choice.

[StLane]

From the perspective of pursuing comfort, my feelings towards the Honda UR-V and CR-V are quite different. After riding in a friend's UR-V, I was immediately captivated by its sense of luxury: the interior is wrapped in soft leather, the sound insulation is excellent, it remains rock-solid at high speeds, and the rear space is so spacious that three people can sit without feeling cramped. In comparison, the CR-V's interior leans more towards practicality, with a slightly stronger plastic feel, and while the seats are comfortable, they lack the refinement of the UR-V. In terms of driving experience, the UR-V has stronger power, with its 2.0T engine delivering vigorous acceleration, making it suitable for long trips or occasions where you want to make an impression. The CR-V, on the other hand, is more economical, with its 1.5T engine saving fuel and being more agile. Although the UR-V may be more expensive in terms of price and maintenance, its advanced suspension and technology, such as multi-zone air conditioning, make for a more relaxing experience. Overall, if the budget allows and you prioritize quality of life, the UR-V is the superior choice; the CR-V, while good, feels a bit more ordinary.

[VanLiam]

I prioritize saving money, so I compared the Honda UR-V and CR-V in terms of cost-effectiveness. The CR-V is more affordable, with new models priced around 200,000 yuan. It has low fuel consumption, cheaper insurance, and high resale value in the used car market, making it easy to sell. The UR-V offers more space and luxurious features, but its starting price is tens of thousands higher, with average fuel consumption of 9-10 liters per 100 km, and potentially higher maintenance costs. The hybrid version of the CR-V is even more fuel-efficient, perfect for city commuting. While the UR-V is spacious and comfortable, it's less cost-effective unless you frequently transport passengers or have specific needs. For daily use, the CR-V is more than sufficient for family needs, saving both money and hassle.