What are the differences between the first, second, and third generations of BYD F3?
2 Answers
The differences between the first, second, and third generations of BYD F3 lie in their configurations and prices. The later the generation, the more comprehensive the configuration. Below is a detailed introduction about BYD F3: 1. Overview: BYD F3 is an A+ class passenger car launched by BYD Auto, officially released on April 16, 2005. The design concept of F3 draws on the successful experiences and models of Japanese and Korean car development. The "mm" design concept (which means maximizing the space for people inside the car while minimizing the space occupied by necessary machinery) runs through the entire design of F3. 2. Others: The wheelbase is 2600mm. The vehicle dimensions are 4.533 meters in length, 1.705 meters in width, and 1.490 meters in height. The trunk volume is 480 liters. The fuel consumption is 5.9L/100km. The fuel tank capacity is 50 liters. The engine type is BYD473QE, a VVL variable valve lift engine. The top speed is 170km/h. The acceleration time is 11.3 seconds. The drive method is front-wheel drive.
As someone who keeps up with automotive trends, I've always been fascinated by the evolution of the BYD F3. The first-generation F3 was launched around 2005, featuring a conservative design that mimicked the old-school Corolla styling. It had a modest front grille, square and simple headlights, and an overall boxy silhouette that made it rather inconspicuous on the road. The second generation, introduced in 2010, showcased a noticeably modernized appearance—sharper headlight designs, a wider grille, and slightly more streamlined body lines, giving it a less rigid look. The third-gen F3, which underwent a major redesign post-2015, embraced a fully youthful aesthetic with fluid lines, LED daytime running lights, and dynamic alloy wheels, creating a sporty effect and much better overall proportions. On the road, the third-gen always turns heads, while the first-gen now feels outdated. BYD's progress in design language is quite evident—transitioning from the utilitarian first-gen to the trendy third-gen not only enhanced the car's appeal but also reflected shifting consumer preferences for automotive aesthetics. I believe younger buyers would lean toward the third-gen for its urban flair, while the first-gen might appeal more to nostalgic car enthusiasts.
