What are the differences between the Classic Sylphy and the New Sylphy?

[Stacey]

The differences between the Classic Sylphy and the New Sylphy are as follows: Body Dimensions: The Classic Sylphy measures 4631mm × 1760mm × 1503mm in length, width, and height; the New Sylphy measures 4641mm × 1815mm × 1450mm. Wheelbase: The Classic Sylphy has a wheelbase of 2700mm, while the New Sylphy has a wheelbase of 2712mm. Tires: The Classic Sylphy comes with 195/60-R16 tires, whereas the New Sylphy is equipped with 215/50-R17 tires. Engine Power: The Classic Sylphy's 1.6L naturally aspirated engine delivers a maximum power of 91KW and a maximum torque of 153Nm. In contrast, the New Sylphy's 1.6L naturally aspirated engine produces a maximum power of 93KW and a maximum torque of 154Nm.

[VanAngelo]

I've driven both the Classic Sylphy and the new Sylphy several times, and there's a noticeable difference in their exterior and interior designs. The Classic version has a more traditional design with a squared-off front grille and simpler body lines. Inside, the materials feel harder with more plastic, and while the seats offer decent support, they seem a bit outdated. The new Sylphy, on the other hand, is much more stylish, featuring a streamlined body with LED headlights, more soft-touch materials and a touchscreen in the cabin, as well as a more spacious layout and better driving visibility. In terms of comfort, the new Sylphy's suspension is tuned to be softer, making it more stable over speed bumps, while the Classic Sylphy might appeal more to those who prefer a simpler style. Additionally, for daily maintenance, parts for the Classic version are cheaper and easier to find, whereas the new Sylphy requires newer designed components, which can sometimes be more expensive. Overall, if you're after a fresh feel, the new Sylphy definitely comes out on top; but if you're on a budget, the Classic version is quite practical, especially for city commuting, as both models are similarly fuel-efficient.

[LeSophia]

After switching to the new Sylphy myself, I noticed significant advancements in technology and safety. The new Sylphy comes standard with an intelligent driving assistance system, including adaptive cruise control and blind spot monitoring, paired with a large central control screen that supports smartphone connectivity. The voice control is also quite responsive. On the other hand, the classic Sylphy is much more basic, mostly equipped with just a radio and a small screen, and lacking some safety features like additional airbags. In daily use, the new Sylphy's rearview camera is clearer, and the road feedback is more immediate, making novice drivers feel more at ease. Although upgrading these features comes with a slight premium, in the long run, it helps avoid potential risks. I also noticed that the battery management is more intelligent, offering decent fuel savings over time. In conclusion, if you enjoy trying out new gadgets, the new Sylphy is worth the price difference; otherwise, the classic version is simpler and requires less hassle.

[DeMichael]

As a long-time car owner, I've driven the classic Sylphy for nearly a decade. Now test-driving the new Sylphy, I find they each have their pros and cons in terms of economy. The classic version is much more affordable, typically starting 20,000-30,000 yuan cheaper. Its daily fuel consumption remains stable at 6-7 liters per 100km, and maintenance is inexpensive with hassle-free insurance and part replacements. Although the new Sylphy requires higher initial investment, its engine has been updated with slightly better fuel efficiency and doesn't struggle when running air conditioning. In terms of reliability, the classic Sylphy has fewer issues and is easier to repair, holding its value well in the used car market. The new Sylphy has more electronic components, potentially leading to more minor faults and slightly more complex repairs. For those on a tight budget, I'd recommend the classic Sylphy - it's like a reliable old friend, worry-free and durable, with genuinely low long-term ownership costs.