What are the differences between the Audi S3 and RS3?
3 Answers
The differences between the Audi S3 and RS3 are: 1. Different models: The Audi S3 is the original sports model; the RS3 is the high-performance model. 2. Different power: The Audi S3 is equipped with a 2.0T engine with a maximum power of 213 kW; the RS3 is equipped with a 2.5 engine with a maximum power of 294 kW. 3. Different tire specifications: The Audi S3 has tire specifications of 225/40R18; the RS3 has tire specifications of 255/30R19. 4. Different body dimensions: The Audi S3 has body dimensions of 4474mm in length, 1796mm in width, and 1392mm in height; the RS3 has body dimensions of 4479mm in length, 1802mm in width, and 1399mm in height.
I really enjoy studying these kinds of performance cars. The difference between the Audi S3 and RS3 is actually quite significant, mainly depending on how you want to drive. The S3 uses a four-cylinder turbocharged engine with around 300 horsepower, capable of accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in under 5 seconds. It's already a blast to drive daily, effortlessly overtaking in the city, and fuel consumption is well controlled at about 8-9 liters per 100 km. But the RS3 is on a whole other level—it comes with the signature five-cylinder engine, pushing horsepower up to 400. Its acceleration is terrifyingly fast, breaking 100 km/h in under 4 seconds, and the exhaust note is particularly rugged, sounding like a roaring race car. In terms of chassis tuning, the RS3 is stiffer and more planted in corners, while the S3 is softer and more comfortable. Fuel consumption for the RS3 is higher, close to 12 liters, and maintenance parts are considerably more expensive. If you're looking for daily convenience and cost savings, the S3 is absolutely sufficient. But if you truly want a more thrilling driving experience, the RS3 is the one to go for, though it comes with a significantly higher price tag. Overall, the differences lie in performance levels and driving styles—choosing between them depends on your budget and mood.
When buying a car, I always weigh practicality against price. The performance difference between the S3 and RS3 is noticeable, but so is the price gap. The S3 starts at over 400,000, while the RS3 starts at over 600,000—a difference of around 200,000. After purchase, you also need to factor in insurance and maintenance costs. RS3 insurance might cost a few thousand more per year, and each maintenance service could be over a thousand more expensive. The RS3's higher fuel consumption adds another 1,000–2,000 annually. For daily driving, the S3's four-cylinder engine is plenty fast and hassle-free, with quieter operation and a softer suspension that doesn’t shake your backside during commutes. The RS3's five-cylinder is powerful but overly aggressive for city use, often feeling wasted, and its stiffer ride can tire out passengers on bumpy roads. Design-wise, both look great, though the RS3 has more aggressive styling details. In terms of resale value, the RS3 depreciates slower but loses more initially. I think the S3 offers better value for most people—saving money while still delivering solid performance. The RS3 suits those with extra cash who love to show off.
