
The differences between the Audi A4L 35 and 40 are: 1. Different body lengths: The 35 has a body length of 4858mm; the 40 has a body length of 4851mm. 2. Different curb weights: The 35 has a curb weight of 1610kg; the 40 has a curb weight of 1615kg. 3. Different power outputs: The 35 has a maximum horsepower of 150ps, a maximum power of 110kw, and a maximum torque of 270nm; the 40 has a maximum horsepower of 190ps, a maximum power of 140kw, and a maximum torque of 320nm. 4. Other body dimensions of the Audi A4L 35 and 40 are the same: width of 1847mm, height of 1439mm, and a wheelbase of 2908mm.

If you care about driving pleasure when buying an A4L, the 40 TFSI is noticeably more powerful. It accelerates quickly when you step on the gas pedal in the initial phase, with no hesitation when overtaking, especially on highways where it has stronger staying power. The 35 TFSI is also acceptable, but its 150-horsepower engine is just adequate for daily commuting and might struggle a bit when fully loaded or climbing slopes. During my test drive, I specifically compared them—under full throttle, the 40 TFSI reaches 100 km/h over a second faster than the 35 TFSI. Fuel consumption is actually similar for both, with the 40 TFSI burning about 0.8 liters more per 100 km in city driving. By the way, the 40 TFSI comes standard with 19-inch large wheels, while the 35 TFSI has 18-inch ones, which look slightly less impressive. If your budget allows, I highly recommend going straight for the 40 TFSI, especially for young drivers who prefer a more spirited drive.

Last month, I specifically researched the price difference between these two models when helping my daughter choose a car. The 40 is about 20,000 yuan more expensive than the 35, mainly due to the engine tuning. Despite both having a 2.0T displacement, the 40's 204 horsepower is over 50 more than the 35's. Both use a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission. The fuel consumption difference is actually minimal—my daughter commutes 60 km daily, and the 40 costs only about 100 yuan more per month in fuel. The 40 also includes automatic parking and dynamic turn signals as standard, while the 35 requires additional payment for these features. My advice is to go for the 35 if you plan to change cars within three years, but the 40 is more durable and holds its value better if you intend to drive it for over five years.

As someone stuck in daily commutes, I genuinely feel the 35 is sufficient. In the city, the RPM rarely exceeds 3000, and 150 horsepower is more than adequate. My 35 averages just 8.2L/100km in urban driving, about 0.7L less than my colleague's 40. The savings are enough for two extra Starbucks each week. However, it's worth noting that the 35 does feel sluggish when fully loaded with the AC on—once during a family trip, I had to rev up to 4000 RPM just to overtake a truck. Another small detail: the 40 comes standard with a panoramic sunroof, while it's an optional extra on the 35. If you frequently tackle mountain roads on weekends, I'd recommend going straight for the 40.


