What are the differences between the 911 Turbo and Turbo S?

[MacGavin]

Here are the specific differences between the Porsche 911 Turbo and Turbo S: 1. Displacement: The Porsche Turbo has a displacement of 3.8L. The Porsche Turbo S has a displacement of 3.6L, meaning the Turbo has a higher displacement. 2. 0-100 km/h acceleration: The Porsche Turbo accelerates from 0-100 km/h in just 3.0s. The Porsche Turbo S does it in 4.2s, making the Turbo faster in acceleration. 3. Maximum torque: The Porsche Turbo has a maximum torque of 650 Nm. The Porsche Turbo S has a maximum torque of 620 Nm, indicating that the Turbo is more powerful.

[NoahRose]

As a long-time Porsche driver, I believe the biggest difference between the 911 Turbo and Turbo S lies in their performance. The 911 Turbo is already incredibly powerful, typically delivering around 580 horsepower with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of under 2.8 seconds, which is more than adequate for daily driving. However, the Turbo S is even more wild, boasting an increased horsepower of 640 or more and shaving off over 0.2 seconds in acceleration, resulting in a noticeably more intense push-back sensation during actual driving. The tires and suspension are also tuned more aggressively, providing significantly better stability when exiting corners. The S version comes standard with ceramic composite brake discs, offering quicker response. Both models feature a 3.8-liter twin-turbo engine, but the S version has higher turbo pressure and an optimized ECU, delivering more linear power output. That said, during daily commutes, you might not notice much difference unless you frequently hit the track or floor the accelerator on highways. Maintenance-wise, Turbo S parts can be more expensive, but if you're after ultimate handling, the extra cost is well worth it. Overall, the 911 Turbo is for those seeking a balanced performance, while the S version is tailored for enthusiasts who crave squeezing every last drop of horsepower.

[LaMadison]

From a daily driving perspective, after experiencing both models, I found minimal differences between the 911 Turbo and Turbo S. Their interior space is nearly identical, with equally comfortable seats, and both come standard with air conditioning and infotainment systems. However, in urban driving conditions, the Turbo S's suspension feels slightly stiffer, transmitting more noticeable vibrations over speed bumps. While it delivers stronger performance, fuel consumption is marginally higher—about 0.5 liters more per 100 kilometers. The Turbo variant, in contrast, offers smoother handling with lighter steering assistance, reducing fatigue during traffic jams. Practical features like trunk capacity are identical, though maintenance costs for the Turbo may be lower due to cheaper standard parts. Unless frequently driving on highways, the extra cost for the S version seems unnecessary; but for those occasional bursts of speed, the Turbo S's acceleration is undeniably thrilling. In summary, the 911 Turbo suits those balancing commuting and family needs, while the S version caters to drivers seeking occasional exhilaration—though the Turbo maintains an edge in everyday comfort.

[Sanchez]

As a buyer with a limited budget, I believe the core difference between the 911 Turbo and Turbo S lies in their price-to-performance ratio. The 911 Turbo typically starts at over $200,000, while the Turbo S is 15% to 20% more expensive. The extra horsepower isn't worth it for daily driving. Maintenance costs are also higher, with more frequent tire replacements and potentially increased insurance premiums. However, the S version usually holds its value better, depreciating slower on the used market. If you're on a tight budget, the Turbo is sufficient—it offers strong performance without wasting money. If funds allow and you're seeking a status symbol, the S version's upgrades, like standard rear-wheel steering, are more practical. Overall, the Turbo is a solid choice for the average user.